The air in Murnau's market town council was thick on Wednesday evening.
The committee discussed the ongoing topic of the substation again.
In the end there was a decision.
However, after the representatives continued to debate behind closed doors, this quickly became obsolete.
The subject of "relocating the Murnau substation" is not yet off the table.
In a special session on Wednesday evening, some of the tatters flew.
The town hall came up with a surprise on Thursday afternoon.
Murnau
- The necessary contracts between the market town of Murnau and Bayernwerk Netz GmbH regarding the relocation of the substation should be available by March at the latest.
The network operator specifies this schedule.
In February it should be clear whether the property owners directly affected agree.
A sporty schedule.
Re-opened barrel
Actually, the municipal council had already shelved the chapter in December.
At that time he decided that the relocation would fail because a location was missing.
Then there were bitter allegations against Mayor Rolf Beuting (ÖDP / Bürgerforum), which he rejected.
The parliamentary groups ÖDP / Bürgerforum and Bündnis 90 / Die Grünen then opened the barrel again.
They applied for properties south and south-east of the Weindorf landfill to be checked again in order to build an enclosed facility there.
thick air
On Wednesday evening, the local council dealt with the whole topic in a special meeting.
Opinions clashed.
The fronts - hardened.
The mood - tense.
On the part of the CSU, parliamentary group spokesman Rudolf Utzschneider worked hard.
Among other things, he wanted to know whether there were already legally binding easements.
Beuting said: “You cannot make contracts as long as the CSU has not approved an application.
We only heard from you concerns. "
CSU rejects criticism
Utzschneider said no.
His group agreed to several locations.
He contradicted the "impression that there are groups that are against a transfer".
Franz Neuner (CSU) also made it clear that neither the CSU nor he had "ever been against a relocation in general".
“It's all about feasibility.” But Welf Probst (Free Voters) also held up against the Christian Socialists: “You're just against it.” The CSU looks for a needle in a haystack with every proposal.
The escalation
Utzschneider accused Beuting of trying to "make him look ridiculous with personal statements".
The CSU spokesman also denied that it was only up to a landowner that a relocation did not work.
Maria Schägger, parliamentary group spokeswoman for the Free Voters, broke the collar.
She recalled the peppered press release that Utzschneider, Green Party spokeswoman Veronika Jones and Mehr-Bewegen spokesperson Phillip Zoepf sent around the turn of the year.
In it, they made Mayor Beuting solely responsible for the failure of the relocation.
“Don't be angry with me: be ashamed of yourself,” said Schägger at Utzschneider's address.
Felix Burger (SPD) also found the press release borderline.
“That was difficult material that was hard to take.
You can't treat each other like that. "
Twelve councils per request
So it went back and forth.
Beuting was convinced: “Any of the ten locations could be realized if the will is there.” Zoepf saw it differently.
He had previously expressed criticism.
If the topic of relocation had been “started three years ago, it could have been made a success with the participation of the landowners”.
The mayor suggested that the meeting be interrupted for a non-public part.
But it did not get to that.
In the end, twelve councils voted for the motion that the ÖDP / Citizens' Forum and Alliance 90 / The Greens had made.
Ten were against it, namely the representatives of the CSU and of Mehr Bewegen.
Concerns from residents
At the beginning, two citizens had spoken out.
Simone Strobl from Weindorf emphasized that the relocation in December was "off the table".
"This creates a total credibility problem." Andreas Neuner, also from Weindorf, raised the concerns of an interest group (IG) against a location at the green waste dump.
The points of criticism in the letter that the mayor and the councilors received and that is also available to the daily newspaper are varied.
One reads: “The planned areas are close to existing residential developments.
This prevents the municipality from developing any form of urban development in this area and also represents a devaluation of the existing residential areas. "
Location at landfill "not acceptable"
In addition, the IG notes that a move from one central location would in future make two.
Because Bayernwerk would not completely clear the field on Dr.-Schalk-Straße.
Another point: A residential development on Dr.-Schalk-Straße is "not feasible in our eyes".
In addition, the location of the discussed locations in the area of the green waste collection point is "not acceptable for a facility of this size from the point of view of landscape and nature conservation and the appearance of the town".
But that's not all: "The creation of commercial space for a substation will not prevent further commercial operations from settling in this area in the future," fears the initiative.
She suspects “that individual parties are desperately looking for emergency solutions that do not add value to Murnau.
The location, which has already been checked and re-proposed, will not bring any improvement for Murnau, but in the best case will represent a relocation of the problems in terms of location and time for a very high price. " all other variants apparently no longer play a role in the re-examination.
The initiative is convinced: "With a relocation to the very north of Murnau, we believe that significantly higher added value could be created for the next few decades without directly affecting local residents and negatively affecting Murnau's urban development."
Manlik countered
Michael Manlik, spokesman for the ÖDP / Citizens' Forum, took the position on point by point, rejected most of the concerns, but admitted that the landscape would be impaired by such a building.
"But not as serious as it is portrayed." Manlik emphasized: "To do everyone justice is not possible."
But still pulled together
Then on Thursday afternoon the surprise via press release from the market town.
“The local council decided unanimously to work together to move the substation to a location south of the TSV site,” it says.
This was decided by the local parliament in the non-public part.
The location south of the TSV site "presents itself as the best possible location for all parliamentary groups, the implementation of which is now the top priority," says the message sent by the deputy manager Nina Herweck-Bockhorni.
“That is why all capacities are now being given priority to this test, the location near the landfill is being put on hold for the time being.” Beuting was satisfied: “I am very pleased that we found a common path from yesterday's meeting everyone is convinced, because only then is there a chance of implementing such a major project. "
Also interesting:
Murnau receives a large police center
