The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

"Olivier Duhamel case, book by Vanessa Springora: where are the fathers?"

2021-02-11T19:13:09.541Z


TRIBUNE - The sex therapist and essayist Thérèse Hargot sees in Camille Kouchner's book, La Familia grande, a "bomb that destroys many ideas of the sexual revolution", showing the deleterious atmosphere of a libertarian family where the father is absent. And this absence, we ...


Author of several well-known works, Thérèse Hargot has notably published “What could save love?”

(Albin Michel, 2020, 208 p., € 17.90).

La Familia grande

is not a book on incest.

It is a book that questions the mechanisms of silence that surround incest in a family.

Shade.

And not just any family, it is that of Camille Kouchner, daughter of Bernard Kouchner, doctor and former minister, and Evelyne Pisier professor of law, as well as stepdaughter of Olivier Duhamel, the famous political scientist;

a family in which no one can pretend to ignore the law.

The author of

La Familia grande

is the witness, not the victim.

The subject is the omerta.

Hence the title.

Hence also my questioning: why, since the publication of the book, do we go astray in talking about sexual violence within families without talking about the reasons for silence?

To read also:

Frédéric Beigbeder: "La familia grande, the war of generations"

Incest is the prohibition that founds all human societies, said Claude Lévi-Strauss.

These are practices

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 81% left to discover.

Subscribe: 1 € the first month

Can be canceled at any time

I ENJOY IT

Already subscribed?

Log in

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2021-02-11

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-18T13:26:50.455Z
News/Politics 2024-03-17T09:36:43.770Z
News/Politics 2024-04-07T17:04:49.020Z
News/Politics 2024-03-25T21:44:32.650Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.