Biden is recycling Obama's hawks

It was not surprising that Joe Biden re-appointed the hawks of the Obama era to senior positions, how not and the Biden administration are a throwback to the Obama-Clinton era, which heralded a new era of wars against anyone who challenges the narratives of the American establishment.

This American "left" authorized waves of campaigns of military domination that were devastating not only to Syria, but to the entire region, and Joe Biden himself is no stranger to the illegal US military intervention in Iraq, as he was a staunch supporter of the war on Iraq in 2002, on the basis of The liar of “weapons of mass destruction,” who cited the necessities of the war as a “march towards peace and security,” but what followed did not indicate peace and security for millions of Iraqis, especially with Bush’s “shock and awe” campaign that followed.

Biden's role was pivotal in securing Senate support for Bush to go to war.

Biden was well aware that the Gulf states, the Turkish regime, and Jordan were arming and financing the terrorist groups that had come to Syria.

When the CIA's Timber Sycamore program began transferring weapons and billions of dollars in aid to so-called "moderates" of "al-Qaeda and ISIS" in Syria, Biden was Obama's vice president.

Therefore, it is not a coincidence that the re-emergence of ISIS and their attacks on civilians and members of the Syrian Arab Army was reported at a time when the Biden administration was assuming power in Washington.

Even a few days before Biden’s inauguration, there were conflicting reports of US military build-up on the Syrian island, which necessarily means that whatever happened in the period leading up to the change of power in Washington, the truth is that this area was already occupied, and it is being looted by forces. The American coalition and its separatist proxies.

Hence, the revival of ISIS should not come as a surprise to analysts of the crisis in Syria. In December 2018, Donald Trump unexpectedly announced that he would withdraw American forces from Syria, but the war hawks in the Trump administration obstructed the exit plans.

That is why the latest wave of "ISIS" operations was set at an appropriate time, which is to facilitate the increase in aggression against Syria and the doubling of the American military presence in neighboring Iraq.

That is why the operations of "ISIS" should always be viewed as a close step with the American foreign policy in the region, especially since it is no secret to anyone that the United States has long been transporting ISIS terrorists across the border to Iraq, where they are modernized and equipped before they return to Syria. As "ISIS the Great" in an attempt to maintain continued instability in Syria.

Everyone knows that Biden has the full support of the media to mobilize public support for his military policies, while Trump was the economic hammer, charged with transforming Syria into an economically failed state deprived of resources, driven by food insecurity by targeting agriculture and the infrastructure for food supplies, i.e. Biden is the war machine that the neocons have been waiting patiently for.

Biden chose William Burns as director of the CIA, and in Burns’s book “The Back Channel: The Memoirs of American Diplomacy and the Case for Its Renewal,” he advocated the use of soft power and linking statecraft to the vehicle of covert paramilitary operations and intelligence gathering.

Burns is described as a career diplomat who believes that diplomacy and espionage are two sides of the same coin.

Burns is an old school American diplomat with close ties to Hillary Clinton.

Burns supported the American intervention in Libya, and he regrets that direct American military intervention in Syria was not allowed.

In a 2019 interview at the Truman Center conference on US global leadership, he claimed that military support for “moderates” in Syria should have been increased, and that red lines for direct military intervention should not be established.

Despite his previous reservations about the intervention in Iraq, Burns is not the CIA chief who would argue diplomacy about militarism, but he would keep Biden’s promise that "America is back and ready to lead the world."

Biden chose Samantha Power - a former US representative to the United Nations during the Obama administration - as president of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) - which is in fact Washington's tool for espionage - and since this agency's budget of more than $ 27 billion makes USAID one of the most powerful agencies. “Aid” in the world today, it represents more than half of US foreign aid, which under its guise provides support to terrorists.

Samantha Power was one of the strongest voices hostile to the Syrian patriotic state during Obama's presidency. She was a United Nations ambassador and marketed "chemical weapons" lies, supported by testimony from "White Helmets" agents, associated with British and American intelligence and terrorist groups.

Biden also granted Bauer a seat on the National Security Council, which puts it close to National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, and close to CIA Director Burns, which would form a lethal coalition in favor of the policy of aggression.

The recent National Security Directive on US global leadership in relation to the Covid-19 crisis was a clear opportunity for Washington to review the illegal and illegal sanctions imposed on Syria by previous administrations.

"With Samantha Power leading the USAID ... I fear it will be a battle to break the Syrian state," says Peter Ford, the UK ambassador to Syria between 2003 and 2006.

Recently, a report entitled “The United States Needs a New Policy on Syria” appeared in the form of a rewritten road map, but it appears that this road map may be deceptive.

In reality, it is nothing more than a tactical attempt to whitewash the brutality of economic sanctions.

As for the dangerous situation in this report, it is trying to revive the partition plans, which were partly devised by Jeffrey Feltman, the US ambassador to Beirut from 2004 to 2008.

The RAND policy paper titled “Mobilization and the Future of Conflict” also describes potential tactics that the Biden administration will deploy, using its multiple proxies to carry out isolated attacks on basic Syrian infrastructure and military and civilian targets in order to maintain instability and increase pressure on Syria, the people. And an army and leadership.

This means that Biden will not change the policy of supporting terrorism, which lasted 10 years, but rather will take advantage of the sanctions imposed by the American economic arm, to gain complete control over the region, so there is no doubt that the region is on the verge of an unknown future under Biden's leadership.

Ali Al-Youssef