Eduardo Paladini
02/24/2021 11:03
Clarín.com
Politics
Updated 02/24/2021 11:03 AM
While
Alberto Fernández
continues to seek a political solution to the VIP Vaccination scandal, a
new poll
exclusively
accessed by
Clarín
this Wednesday shows a strong initial impact on the President's image.
Compared to last month, its valuation
fell in 19 of the 24 provinces
of the country.
It is one of the steepest casualties since he took office.
The survey is from
CB Consultora Opinion Pública
, a firm with origins in Córdoba that has been publishing a ranking of governors for just under a year, based on the image in their provinces.
And he was also adding in his measurements district by district figures of national scope, such as the President, Cristina Kirchner, Mauricio Macri, Horacio Rodríguez Larreta, Sergio Massa and even Máximo Kirchner.
In the case of Fernández, he had already suffered a very strong loss in September 2020, when the fight with the City of Buenos Aires became more acute and the President decided to extract millionaire funds from the opponent Larreta to give them to his ally Kicillof.
The February survey of
CB
was carried out between Thursday 18 and Saturday 20. That is, it was measured during the
first two days of the scandal
, when, after the public admission of journalist Horacio Verbitsky, Clarín revealed how the framework was for vaccinate friends of power against Covid, with doses that should basically be destined for health personnel.
Since then, and despite the departure of Minister Ginés González García,
the controversy has not stopped growing
.
With this background scenario, the consulting firm conducted its survey of
between 500 and 1,250 cases
per province.
From a quick glance, it impacts how Fernández
falls in the 10 provinces where he measures best
:
1st
Santiago del Estero
: from 67.7% of positive image in January to 62.5% in February.
2nd
Neuquén
: from 64.1% to 61.8%.
3rd
Formosa
: from 65% to 61.7%.
4th
Chaco
: from 68.4% to 61.2%.
5th
Catamarca
: from 64.5% to 60.4%.
6th
Tierra del Fuego
: from 63.3% to 60.1%.
7th
La Pampa
: from 65.8% to 59.6%.
8th
San Juan
: from 65.2% to 59%.
9
La Rioja
: from 63.6% to 58.8%.
10th
Jujuy
: from 59.4% to 58.1%.
In favor of the President
, his positive image there continues to be very high.
Against
: these are, in general, the smallest districts - and in several cases the poorest - of the country, where Kirchnerism has rooted support, in addition to the Conurbano.
In the 11th place appears the first breath for Fernández.
In
Tucumán
, one of the intermediate provinces in size, its valuation in favor grew from 56.7% to 57.8% between January and February.
It is one of the exceptions, along with
Misiones
(13th, from 55.5% to 56.9%),
Chubut
(15th, from 54.9% to 55.3%),
Santa Cruz
(16th, from 53 , 9% to 54.5%) and
Córdoba
(22 ° 38.2% to 40.6%).
The new Minister of Health, Carla Vizzotti, together with the Chief of Staff, Santiago Cafiero.
They announced the start of the vaccination campaign for teaching staff with the doses developed by the Chinese laboratory Sinopharm.
Photo: Graciela Pace / Communication Minister of Health.
The most striking case in this group is clearly Córdoba,
one of the provinces refractory to the ruling party
.
Although the image of the President is still relatively low (only surpassed in the bad by Mendoza and CABA), it is curious that in one of his worst moments he has improved there, even a little.
The other nine districts where the president's weight dropped were:
12th
Entre Ríos
: from 59.8% to 57.1%.
14th
Currents
: from 55.8% to 55.5%.
17th
Santa Fe
: from 54.2% to 53.9%.
18th
Buenos Aires
: from 54.7% to 53.5%.
19th
Rio Negro
: from 53.1% to 52.6%.
20th
San Luis
: from 52.6% to 51.3%.
21 °
Santa Fe
: from 46.8 ° to 43.4 °.
23 °
Mendoza
: from 37.9% to 37.2%.
24th
CABA
: 36.6% to 35.9%.
In these last cases, there is not much mystery with the reading: except for the Cordovan exception, the
fall of the President
deepens
in the largest provinces
and in the center of the country.
Over the weekend, Clarín had already advanced another study exclusively, in this case of the
Management & Fit
consultancy
, where the strong negative impact of the scandal was reflected in another equal or more sensitive side for the Government: most people
distrusted of the vaccination plan
and called for more resignations from the officials involved.