The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Lieberman knows: Announcements do not go up in voters Israel today

2021-03-02T19:19:27.133Z


| political The chairman of Yisrael Beiteinu does not keep his changing election promises • Therefore, the "Nationality Law" is something that Netanyahu can be attacked for, and then object to. • Opinion Lieberman for and against the Nationality Law in "Meet the Press"  Below is a summary of the Lieberman campaign - the ultra-Orthodox are the source of all the trouble, the underground, a despicable public,


The chairman of Yisrael Beiteinu does not keep his changing election promises • Therefore, the "Nationality Law" is something that Netanyahu can be attacked for, and then object to. • Opinion

  • Lieberman for and against the Nationality Law in "Meet the Press" 

Below is a summary of the Lieberman campaign - the ultra-Orthodox are the source of all the trouble, the underground, a despicable public, a leech, a dodger and the sole person responsible for the fact that yesterday the light bulb in your bathroom burned down.

So far, nothing new.

The point is that Lieberman also addresses the ultra-Orthodox public.

His anxious public.

For Lieberman, this is a secular base that speaks Russian, for Litzman - the ultra-Orthodox-Ashkenazi public in all its shades (if you have to use that phrase). 

Guess both sides will not be happy to hear this, this and that public are anxious for all intents and purposes.

These are ultra-Orthodox for the sake of their managerial autonomy in Hasidism and in the courts, and these are ultra-Orthodox from the ultra-Orthodox in everything related to Jewish identity.

Here, and here exactly, the difference is over.

Like it or not, the ultra-Orthodox parties over the years promise mountains and hills to their constituents, and they usually maintain or at least move mountains and hills to try and sustain.

Oh, and one more thing: their campaigns, unlike Lieberman's, are not based on hatred either.

Lieberman, on the other hand, is not fulfilling and never intended to keep his changing election promises.

To his credit it should be said - from the "Death Penalty for Terrorists Act" to "word is word" (he always had a sense of humor), you can go from announcement to announcement and giggle - but for that there is Google.

Avigdor Lieberman in an interview with Rina Matzliach 16.05.2015: "Whoever gave up the Nationality Law is not right. Netanyahu is not right. If the Nationality Law enters the guidelines of the government, we will enter the government."





Avigdor Lieberman in an interview with Rina Matzliach 27.022021: "The enactment of the Nationality Law was a mistake. Yisrael Beiteinu voted in favor, only because of coalition discipline."

pic.twitter.com/ZfCSszBEEp

- Alon Ronen (@ Ronen23) February 28, 2021

Because we are a state-run newspaper we were also not asked about Mister's level of Arabic knowledge "only Lieberman understands Arabic".

Lieberman, a very clever man, was one of the first to internalize that when there is a blind base, announcements, similar to the name that only needs to be written without errors, do not cost money or voters.

The last star in Lieberman's non-campaign is Nationality Law.

In 2015, he came out in full force against Netanyahu because the latter removed the promotion of the law from the government's guidelines.

"Netanyahu is not right-wing," he declared, "whoever gave up the Nationality Law is not right-wing."

said.

It's filmed.

Then?

On Saturday, with the same Rina and the same successor, Lieberman declared that he was against the Nationality Law. Why? Because like that. Or, if we use Lieberman's simple 2015 model terminology: because Lieberman is simply not right. It would not have happened, simply because Gaffney knows that his false promises will cost him money and voters.

Netanyahu shines in front of the "left-wing media"

And one more thing: the battle of "who ran over whom" in an "interview" that Udi Segal has with Netanyahu is still abandoned and wounded are scattered in the field while chanting "Segal showed him" on the one hand and "Netanyahu defeated."

This argument is unnecessary.

Netanyahu will prefer twenty more interviews with Udi Segal, Yonit Levy and even Gideon Levy over an interview with Kalman Liebskind or any interviewer who attacks him from the right.

Netanyahu shines in front of the "left-wing media".

Against Liebskind & Co., on the other hand, even without any question about Milchen and veteran submarines, Netanyahu has nothing in the cartridge other than "lawyers did not give me" and "I appointed a committee."

It does not work for the Liebskinders and Netanyahu is as careful of them as fire.

We all know why, right?

Source: israelhayom

All news articles on 2021-03-02

You may like

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-03-27T16:45:54.081Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.