Laurence Taillade is an essayist.
She published
L'urgence laïque
and
Being a woman in 2020,
published by Michalon.
She is the co-author of
Une France SUBJECT
, published by Albin Michel, and president of the Republican Solidarist Party.
The kidnappings of young girls in Nigeria by Boko Haram have followed one another since 2014. The last kidnapping, dated February 25, 2021, hardly aroused political reactions in our country.
In Iraq, it is the Yazidi women, a Kurdish minority living in the northwest, who are the mass martyrs of Daesh, in the deafening silence of the international authorities.
According to Mr. Ban Ki-Moon, Secretary General of the UN, several minorities are victims of crimes against humanity, war crimes and other very serious violations of human rights, with a privileged target that are women and girls.
What these victims have in common is that they belong to ethnic and religious minorities, for the most part.
The ideology defended by the terrorist groups that are rampant in these regions is incompatible with diversity.
The destiny of these young women is always the same.
Considered as vulgar commodities, they are negotiated against ransoms demanded from families or the authorities for one part, reduced to slavery for others, and therefore intended to be forcibly married and raped.
Their bellies become weapons of war destined to give birth to an army of docile young jihadists.
Spectacular kidnappings are also a terrorist act in their own right, since they anesthetize the target populations of any act of rebellion, for fear of seeing one of their family members kidnapped and sold.
Indeed, the trade of human beings remains a profitable practice for these armed groups which have no consideration for their congeners.
This custom has been written into their history for many years.
However, the example followed by these warriors is that of the prophet who, himself, already had similar procedures.
The trade in human beings remains a profitable practice for these armed groups who have no regard for their fellow human beings.
Laurence Taillaide
In the Medinic part of the Koran, from 622, dogma divides the world into two parts.
On the one hand the infidels, who must be subjugated or converted, inhabiting regions ruled by wicked people, on the other regions dominated by Islamic jurisdiction.
The great Islamic conquests of the 7th century resulted in the capture of many prisoners.
These prisoners, sometimes killed, sometimes employed to swell the ranks of warriors, were also reduced to the status of domestic slaves.
Very quickly, negotiations took place with the kings and other local dignitaries.
They get to be held in place for a tribute as female and male slaves.
At the same time, in the Mediterranean, raids were carried out by Arab privateers on the North and West coasts of the Mediterranean basin.
These slaves, mainly from black peoples, are the subject of a trade allowing both to serve in the salt mines and to fill the office of domestic staff.
The most beautiful women were destined for the harems of sultans.
Their bodies became objects of pleasure and matrices to ensure a large lineage for them.
The latter did not hesitate to recognize the children born of these forced unions, even if rare are these descendants of slaves who could claim to inherit the goods and titles of their father.
If the practice is ancestral, there is, moreover, a legislation which leaves no doubt about the inferiority of the disbeliever, in the Koran.
The status of Dhimmi, a second-class citizenship conditional on the payment of a tax, is imposed on colonized populations who do not wish to convert and stay alive.
It was coupled with a dress requirement, to make them recognizable, the yellow of which remained for the Jews, formerly in the form of a ring.
The slave trade lasted until the twentieth century ru
e
.
He makes Arab-Muslims the greatest persecutors of the black people.
The most probable estimate evokes 17 million victims.
If the practice is ancestral, there is, moreover, a legislation which leaves no doubt about the inferiority of the disbeliever, in the Koran
Laurence Taillade
The ideological sources of current terrorist groups are those of a purist reading of the Koran, taking up the life and practices of their prophet as a model, which could explain the flight, following persecution, of ethnic or religious minorities from the conquered territories of France. 'Islamism.
In France, the Salafist current offers its followers to follow the path of the Salafs as the only Islam they qualify as pure and authentic.
These are the first three generations of the Prophet Mahommet's companions.
Any other form of practice is rejected.
The concern of separatism emanating from this rigorous practice of Islam should lead any responsible politician to turn away from ambiguous relations with these sectarian groups.
However, since 1920 and the Congress of the peoples of the East, history shows us that the revolutionary left has objectively sided with the Islamists.
These Marxists found common struggles and an opportunity to destabilize the existing order.
Opting for the vocabulary of the Muslim Brotherhood and giving credit to the term Islamophobia, on the one hand, integrating into their ranks the supporters of racialist theories on the other, they also adopted the causes: the fight against the State of 'Israel and white imperialism, mainly.
Substituting the race struggle for the class struggle, in alliances of opportunity, they found in these new damned people of the earth perfect allies, to the point of coming to terms with genuine racists, an ideology that they have always defended. to marry, or with authoritarian regimes.
We see them at work in 1979, supporting the Mullahs in Iran, for example.
It is clear that this French left, so quick to support these natives and other post-colonial activists who accuse the West and France in particular, of crimes against humanity and of appeasement with slavery, does not seem very quick to give voice in defense of minorities victims of the ideology with which it associates in demonstrations of shame.
History shows us that the revolutionary left has objectively sided with the Islamists
Laurence Taillade
They who claim to defend freedom become tense when we approach the symbol of the veiling of women, that they immediately disconnect from the Islamist regimes which impose it by force on half of their population.
Not a word for these minority communities in the mouths of these so-called feminists, environmentalists and revolutionary leftists.
Not a demonstration on the horizon to demand an end to these abuses.
It must be said that it would look bad when we spent our time showing off alongside the CCIF and other Islamist leaders.
It seems that their indignation is variable geometry.
Another demonstration, if it were necessary, that Islamogauchism is indeed a reality.
