Jean-Pierre Sakoun was president of the Laïcité République Committee from 2017 to 2021.
On January 6, 2016, on France Inter, on the eve of the first commemoration of the terrorist attack of January 7, 2015 against
Charlie Hebdo
, Élisabeth Badinter said:
"We must not be afraid to be called Islamophobic, which has been for quite a few years, the absolute stop, the prohibition to speak and almost the suspicion on secularism.
Once people understand that it is a weapon against secularism, perhaps they will be able to put their fear aside ”
.
With these words, Elisabeth Badinter shook off the yoke which weighed a little more on the shoulders of the laity every day.
Moreover, the supporters of “adjectivated secularism”, that is to say, let's be clear, the defenders of a concordatory form of organization of society, were not mistaken.
The general rapporteur of the Observatory of secularism, cracked a sad tweet, which it is useful to recall:
"When a three-year educational work on secularism is destroyed by an interview with France Inter of a no one.
When will there be a real clear debate?
"
.
A few weeks earlier, two days after the Bataclan and Terraces massacre on November 13, 2015, this same rapporteur and the President of the Observatory had found nothing better than to sign, in
Liberation
, a forum worried about reprisals that the French Muslims risked knowing.
It seemed to them more important to associate their names with those of personalities like the rapper Medina, rather than to solemnly reaffirm the defense of secularism.
Let us remember, for the sake of completeness, that contrary to what the Islamists and their useful idiots want us to believe, the Islamo-leftists and others, "Islamophobia" * does not kill in the country of freedom of conscience and respect for people. others, but that it is indeed radical Islam, Islamism, to which we owe the massacre or assassination of nearly 300 of our fellow citizens since Merah in 2012.
Contrary to what the Islamists and their useful idiots, the Islamo-leftists and others want us to believe, "Islamophobia" does not kill people.
Jean-Pierre Sakoun
The word “Islamophobia” is a multi-headed strategic missile in the hands of the enemies of the Republic, secularism, emancipation and individual freedoms.
He wants to ban any criticism of Islam;
it helps to separate our fellow citizens of Muslim religion or culture from the national community;
he tries to persuade them that they are the victims of "systemic" racism;
he thus encourages them to close in on themselves.
They then become easy prey for the identity entrepreneurs of hatred that are the Muslim brothers and the Salafists.
Since 1989 and the Creil veil affair, the Islamists have been galvanized.
That year, they launched into the mother of battles by attacking the only major European democracy which does not recognize in its institutions the role of ethnic or religious communities.
They wanted to break the secular lock in one of the countries hosting the largest number of immigrants of the Muslim religion to seize them.
They expected to have to wage a bitter and difficult struggle against the emancipatory power of the Republic;
they had the "divine surprise" to find that Lionel Jospin surrendered immediately and without a fight in the face of their first attack.
It took fifteen years to repair this major political fault thanks to the law of 2004 prohibiting the wearing of religious symbols in the school of the Republic;
But the damage was done.
This is how for thirty years, despite the struggle of all secularists, starting with the team of
Charlie
and Charb, whose posthumous pamphlet, "Letter to the crooks of Islamophobia who play the game of racists" remains an essential work, the Islamists, through their most dubious pharmacies, focus their fire on France.
They lead their campaigns in France itself, but also with European authorities, quick to lend an attentive and malicious ear to all accusations of racism and therefore of Islamophobia.
The accusation of Islamophobia has found new impetus in the French university.
The latter, silently contaminated by the positively delusional influence of
subaltern studies
born in American universities, has now caught fire.
Battalions of doctoral students, self-appointed specialists in Islamophobia, join the ranks of a sociology which, from science in danger has become a science of danger, as Gerald Bronner has perfectly said.
The accusation of Islamophobia has found new impetus in the French university
Jean-Pierre Sakoun
It is in these university battalions that the pseudo-scientific interference is strongest.
An attempt is made to trace the appearance of the term back to obscure ethnographic studies on the Bambara ethnic group in 1910;
we dissect the word to explain learnedly that it is indeed to fight against those who would have declared a kind of mental illness, a phobia, an obsessive fear of Muslims ... In reality, we know well that the notion of Islamophobia would definitely have languishing in the dustbins of history where it had its place if the Iranian mullahs had not taken it out to make it the justification for their fatwa against Salman Rushdie and look away from international opinion from the violence and abuses of their theocratic dictatorship.
This is all that is synthesized by the term Islamophobia, which has become the gag order of freedom of conscience and emancipation and the instrument of house arrest for identity of Muslims.
The latest events, which culminate with the witch hunt launched at the IEP in Grenoble against two teachers, clearly show that it is no longer time to procrastinate.
University authorities, rather than draping themselves in a dignity that they are unfortunately losing, must have the courage to face reality, that is to say the enterprise of infiltrating a large part of French social sciences for the benefit of the most backward, the most obscurantist, the most violent ideologies.
The Islamist offensive against the Republic under the banner of Islamophobia and the support of an increasingly important part of the left in rupture with all its ideals and all its objectives, constitute a policy of the worst which opens the way to the extreme right.
University authorities, rather than draping themselves in a dignity that they are unfortunately losing, must have the courage to face reality
Jean-Pierre Sakoun
It is not the French citizens who should be blamed but those who, by ideology or by calculation, despair and insult them by assigning them to the fantasies of Islamophobia, racism and colonial domination, three generations later. the end of the French Empire.
What the warriors of Islamophobia want is to establish apartheid between French Muslims and the rest of the national community.
The accusation of Islamophobia is that, the attempt to destroy the very notion of the French people, in favor of the domination of fundamentalists and fanatics over "the umma", the transnational community of believers.
Anti-Maghreb racism exists and it is the honor of the Republic and the French to fight it valiantly.
Despite all the Islamist attempts to stir up the irreparable by raising some excitement against their fellow Muslims, nothing like this has happened.
The same is true of the xenophobia which affects Algerians, Moroccans, Tunisians and all those who are subjected to the irrepressible hostility of imbeciles.
But religion is neither a race, nor an ethnicity, nor a nationality.
Criticism of Islam is permitted and is even beneficial.
As Fatiha Agag-Boudjahlat writes, the teenager who caused Samuel Paty's death through her lies is in school;
the little thugs who persecute Mila go to school.
Mila must live under protection.
Samuel Paty died beheaded.
She specifies:
“It is not Islamophobia, an imaginary crime, which kills.
Only Islamism kills.
Only the accusation of Islamophobia kills and destroys lives ”
.
* The definition of Islamophobia according to Caroline Fourest:
“The word“ Islamophobia ”has a history, which it is better to know before using it lightly.
It was used in 1979 by the Iranian mullahs who wanted to pass off women who refused to wear the veil as "bad Muslims" by accusing them of being "Islamophobic".
[…] In reality, far from designating any kind of racism, the word Islamophobia is clearly intended to disqualify those who resist fundamentalists: starting with feminists and liberal Muslims.
"