The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Electoral restructuring | The Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office approves the seven countries collectively slander the National People's Congress and decides that the restructuring is the common will of Hong Kong people

2021-03-14T14:43:32.288Z


The National People’s Congress recently passed the "Decision on Improving the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Election System (Draft)" with a high vote. Many countries expressed concern about the situation in Hong Kong. The foreign ministers of the Group of Seven (G7) and the European Union issued a joint voice the day before yesterday (12th).


Political situation

Written by: Wu Zhuoan

2021-03-14 22:35

The last update date: 2021-03-14 22:35

The National People’s Congress recently passed the "Decision on Improving the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Electoral System (Draft)" with a high vote. Many countries expressed concern about the situation in Hong Kong. The foreign ministers of the Group of Seven (G7) and the European Union issued a joint statement the day before yesterday (12), referring to Hong Kong’s dissent. Continue to be suppressed, believing that the people of Hong Kong must believe in their own vote and that different views should not be silenced.

The spokesperson of the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office of the State Council issued a statement today (14) criticizing the G7 for vilifying the decision of the National People's Congress and expressing strong opposition to the interference of relevant countries in China's internal affairs.

The spokesperson criticized the G7 for distorting facts and making unreasonable comments, violating international law and the basic norms of international relations, and grossly interfering in China's internal affairs.

Carrie Lam attends the opening of the National People's Congress deputies meeting (Carrie Lam facebook)

Foreign ministers of the seven major industries have eroded Hong Kong's electoral system

The seven major industrial countries are composed of the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan. The foreign ministers of the seven countries and the EU’s High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy issued earlier statements that the Chinese authorities have basically eroded the democratic elements of Hong Kong’s electoral system. Concerned, referring to the decision clearly showing that the Chinese government intends to exclude dissidents in Hong Kong.

The collective statement of the seven nations mentioned that the decisions of the National People's Congress and the large-scale arrest of pro-democracy activists undermined Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy under "one country, two systems."

The seven countries and the European Union believe that the changes will stifle plural politics, run counter to the move towards universal suffrage as stipulated in the Basic Law, and also restrict the freedom of speech guaranteed in the Sino-British Joint Declaration.

Beijing intends to add a "gate entry" threshold for the Legislative Council election.

Spokesperson of the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office approves G7 for gross interference

A spokesperson for the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office of the State Council stated that the amendments and improvements made by the National People’s Congress to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region’s electoral system are purely China’s internal affairs. No foreign country is qualified to make irresponsible remarks and criticize the statement made by the Group of Seven on the relevant decisions of the National People’s Congress for distorting facts. Making reckless comments violates international law and the basic norms of international relations, and is a gross interference in China's internal affairs.

The spokesperson pointed out that the purpose of the decision of the National People's Congress is to build a solid foundation for the stability of one country, two systems in Hong Kong. It describes it as "the common will of the entire Chinese people, including Hong Kong compatriots," and is a fundamental policy to ensure the long-term stability of Hong Kong. It also refers to the proof of practice. To fully and accurately implement the policy of one country, two systems, patriots must rule Hong Kong. To maintain Hong Kong’s prosperity and stability, patriots must rule Hong Kong. To promote the democratic and stable development of Hong Kong, patriots must rule Hong Kong.

The spokesperson also said that "Illegal" activities such as "Hong Kong independence", "black violence", and "speculation" were once raging in Hong Kong, describing it as "directly related to the open or secret support of some Western countries" and "the situation in Hong Kong has changed from chaos to chaos. Today, a few Western countries are still trying to interfere with Hong Kong affairs under the guise of "freedom" and "democracy". Their political schemes are well known to the world. The central government implements the one country, two systems policy to safeguard national sovereignty, security, development interests and Hong Kong The determination of long-term prosperity and stability is unswerving, and the determination of opposing external forces' interference in Hong Kong affairs and interference in China's internal affairs is unswerving. Any hegemonic act will inevitably end in failure."

01News

Election restructuring | Director Kongqun dispatched to support the field Yang Runxiong: Promote the school to do a good job in education of national conditions

Election reform | Zheng Songtai: Non-universal and equal election Chen Jiapei: 300 voices have been widely added

Electoral restructuring︱ Tan Yaozong: The final decision of the review committee may not be overturned by judicial challenges

Electoral restructuring︱Fan Xu Litai: Refers to the improvement of the electoral system is a democratic regression. Those who do not understand democracy

Patriots ruling Hong Kong

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2021-03-14

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.