The person in charge of the notary public was involved in the solicitation of claims. The litigator accused of not affecting justice or exaggerating costs and found guilty

Social News

Written by: Li Huina

2021-03-22 11:50

The last update date: 2021-03-22 11:51

When the person in charge of the notary public was involved in handling a traffic accident claim, he demanded to collect 15% of the compensation as remuneration and involved in litigation.

The person in charge denied being tried for the crime of sharing the results of the lawsuit. The judge today (22nd) ruled that the incident did not affect the relief channels to achieve justice, and the person in charge did not exaggerate the maintenance fee to cover his own service fee. He believed that the prosecution failed to provide evidence. , The person in charge of the ruling was not guilty.

The defendant demanded 15% compensation as remuneration

The defendant Fang Guochang (52 years old) was charged from May 11, 2013 to June 30, 2014 for illegally urging and supporting He Shiwen as his father He Yaorong’s agent in a civil personal claim. If the civil lawsuit is successful, it will 15% is drawn from the compensation as compensation.

The victim's car needs to be repaired and the defendant claims to be able to claim for compensation

The victim, He Shiwen, confessed that when he was driving his father's private car, he was hit by a minibus on Clear Water Bay Road in 2013. When he sent the car for repairs, he received a card from the notary company involved in the case.

He contacted the notary office and was approached by the defendant. The defendant stated that he could claim compensation for him, but once the claim was successful, he would receive 15% of the compensation.

He Yin was greedy and convenient to accept the defendant's services and eventually gave 12,000 yuan to the defendant.

The victim thinks it is greedy and convenient to use the defendant's services

The judge pointed out that although he believed that the defendant did hire a lawyer for He to deal with the claim, which involved interference elements, He admitted that he did not find a lawyer because of the high cost of the lawyer and the convenience of the defendant. This reflected that the incident did not affect the remedy channels to reach justice.

Furthermore, after the defendant assessed the maintenance fee, it was reduced by nearly half. The person in charge of the insurance company also pointed out that the amount was not unreasonable, and there was no evidence that the defendant exaggerated the amount to cover his own expenses.

Case Number: DCCC 251/2020

[Uber Car Accident] Notary Public Claims Compensator Does Not Compensate Car Motorcycle Driver Is Worried About Loss Of Food

Strong mother was hit by a black BMW and had to amputate both feet and file a claim against the driver of the real estate agent who caused the accident

The amendment to the police for bruising cats and dogs will not be extended to the wildlife. The government says it intended to let the owners claim compensation.

01News

Claims court