The quick answer to your question could be nothing, or also, it is unknown.
But let's get to what we do know.
What we do know is that observations indicate that the expansion of the universe is accelerating.
And this is very surprising because gravity (which is the force that counts at great distances like astronomical and cosmological ones) is attractive.
Newton's famous apple fell to the ground, it didn't shoot into the sky.
So, if gravity works as we expect, if Einstein's theory of general relativity works (and, by the way, if our GPS navigator gets us well, it's because it works), the expansion of the universe would have to slow down and not accelerate .
But let's go back a bit.
When Einstein formulated his theory of general relativity all his calculations said that the universe was not stable, it had to expand or contract.
But that idea did not convince Einstein and so he added a term to his equations that would make the cosmos static.
This Einstein addition is known as the cosmological constant.
Looking at his equations, Einstein quickly realized that by adding the cosmological constant to the other side of the = sign, it could be interpreted as a vacuum energy.
And there he left it, for now.
A few years later, a study program on the distances of galaxies culminated in Edwin Hubble reaching the conclusion that the universe is expanding.
The universe is not static, it is expanding.
This was also the first step in arriving at the Big Bang theory and led Einstein to recognize that the cosmological constant was an error.
Dark energy means everything that can explain the observations that we interpret as an accelerated expansion of the universe
We come to the decade of the nineties of the last century.
Then, three researchers, Adam G. Riess, Saul Perlmutter and Brian P. Schmidt (and their collaborators and collaborators), saw that their observations indicated that the expansion of the universe was accelerated, and that this unexpected acceleration could be explained very well with a cosmological constant.
But of course, the observations could also be explained in other ways.
So dark energy means everything that can explain the observations that we interpret as an accelerating expansion of the universe.
Could it be something other than a cosmological constant?
Yes. It could be a cosmological non-constant, which means that it could change over time.
Observations say not much, but they can never tell with infinite precision what exactly is constant.
Could it change in space?
Yes, again the observations say not much, but ...
Could it be that we don't understand gravity on these huge scales?
The scientific community has made an enormous effort and has not found any sign that forces us to modify Einstein's theory of gravity in that sense, but the fact that we have not found it does not mean that it does not exist.
In short, we don't know what dark energy is.
And this is one of the most important unsolved mysteries in physics today.
And if an accelerating expansion of the universe reminds readers of something other than inflation, it is because perhaps the two phenomena are not, after all, fundamentally so different.
Licia Verde
is a cosmologist and theoretical physicist, ICREA professor at the Institut de Ciències del Cosmos of the University of Barcelona.
Question sent via email by
Rómulo Armando Albán Villena
We respond
is a weekly scientific clinic, sponsored by the
Dr. Antoni Esteve Foundation
and the
L'Oréal-Unesco 'For Women in Science' program
,
which answers readers' questions about science and technology.
They are scientists and technologists, members of
AMIT (Association of Women Researchers and Technologists)
, who answer these questions.
Send your questions to
nosotrasrespondemos@gmail.com
or via Twitter #nosotrasrespondemos.
Coordination and writing:
Victoria Toro
You can follow
MATERIA
on
,
and
, or sign up here to receive
our weekly newsletter
.