"The words of Audrey Pulvar are further proof of the racism of the so-called" anti-racist "left

Gilles-William Goldnadel is a lawyer and essayist.

Each week, he deciphers the news for FigaroVox.

Paradox or symptom of the madness of time, we now ask the white person to be silent precisely at the moment when he finally decides to speak.

Thus, the last avatar of the insane sequence on racialized meetings, Audrey Pulvar, deputy mayor of Paris, made a nasty exit.

Asked about BFM after the laborious confession of the president of UNEF, the agricultural assistant cultivated the bad grain that germinates: she is not to ban white, she wants to tolerate it, but on the condition let him loop it: "

That people discriminated against for the same reasons and in the same way feel the need to meet together to discuss, that does not shock me deeply ... If it turns out that a woman comes to this workshop. white, a white man, there is no question of it or throwing him out.

On the other hand, we can ask him to be silent, to be a silent spectator

”.

In short, tolerance in intolerance.

As I indicated in a previous column, my imagination is powerless to describe the intellectual or media reaction if, by a daring hypothesis, I undertook to unite suffering whites by forbidding any black person to enter or by intimidating him. only silence.

It is easy to understand what is happening behind these new ramblings, it is always for the white man the duty of penance.

It is easy to understand what is going on behind these new ramblings, in this variation in discrimination, it is always for the white person the duty of penance.

By absence or by silence.

The novelty, resides, as I announced, in the fact that now the beauf blanc is rebelling.

This is how the meetings where he was banned from the university campus, and which triggered the media storm that we know, had been known for a long time (I had mentioned them in these columns) and had not until then aroused only guilty indifference.

No doubt here again we are slavishly following the ugly American slope where, as the left-wing sociologist from across the Atlantic Mark Lilla has pointed out, the white man, by dint of being pointed out, has regained, alas, a conscience chromatic forgotten.

"READ ALSO - Goldnadel:" Islamogauchism exists and I meet it every day "

"

Me too, I suffer therefore I am

", I warned, ten years ago in my

Reflections on the White Question

(Gawsevitch editions January 2011).

It is therefore not fortuitous that following the last projection of the deputy mayor of Paris, a large part of the political world has emerged from its ancient torpor.

With the notable exclusion, without surprise or hope, of Mr. Mélenchon and Ms. Autain who complimented Ms. Hidalgo's assistant, the president of the Republicans of Île-de-France, Valérie Pécresse declared: "

in my region , no inhabitant should be discriminated against for the color of their skin.

There is no such thing as

"acceptable"

racism

!

“

We cannot be enjoined to speak or to be silent according to our skin color or our origin

” observed Christian Jacob, the president of the Republicans.

The anti-racist media empire that gave birth to this racism is still careful to sort the colorful wheat to cry from the white weeds to hide.

"

The prosecution must initiate proceedings for incitement to racial discrimination against Ms. Pulvar

" asked the president of the National Rally, Marine Le Pen while his lieutenant, Jordan Bardella questioned: "

It is this left that is floundering in Islamo- leftism and the hatred of whites which aspires to preside over the first region of France

? ”.

Neither is it a coincidence that a part of the liberal left as well as enlightened no longer hesitates to name this anti-white racism, unspeakable yesterday.

This is how Rachel Kahn, former political advisor to Jean-Paul Huchon, a young mixed-race woman who believes she must advocate creolization, does not fear to incriminate "

the anti-white racism

" of the Indians of the Republic and in particular the use intolerable, and yet judicially tolerated, term "

souchien

" (

Racée,

editions of the Observatory March 2021 pages 35- 36).

To read also:

Goldnadel: "The negation of anti-white racism is a collective neurosis"

That said, the anti-racist media empire that gave birth to this racism is still careful to sort the colorful wheat to cry from the white weeds to hide.

Thus, last Monday in Boulder, Colorado, a mass massacre was committed such as had not been perpetrated for two years in the United States.

Ten people in a supermarket were murdered.

The event was greatly discounted in the United States and totally ignored in France.

Thus, for example, the public service radio France Inter did not say a word about it in its editions the next morning.

The beauf may rebel, the media compassion in an iniquitous direction is still largely obligatory.

We will compare with the massacre in Charlottesville, Virginia, where the death of an anti-racist activist in August 2017, crushed by a truck driven by a white man nostalgic for the southern secession had inspired millions of words.

We can also compare with the assassination this week in Atlanta of six people of Asian origin in massage parlors, this time widely reported, which allowed the media to invoke the responsibility of the hated former President of the United States. due to its use of the term "

Chinese virus

".

It is true that during the last attack on a synagogue in the United States, the same media did not hesitate to paint Donald Trump as an anti-Semite ...

But this time, in Colorado, the assassin does not have the color of a bastard.

His name is Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa and was born in Syria.

A sign timidly sketched by hand on the place of the ordeal of the ten victims proclaims "

We will not forget

".

No danger of forgetting, they will not enter any memorial.

They were all white and therefore did not have the face of martyrs of a racism to consider.

The beauf may rebel, the media compassion in an iniquitous direction is still largely obligatory.