We were not at all surprised by Washington’s recent media campaign to polish the image of the terrorist Abu Muhammad al-Julani, the leader of the Al-Nusra Front, which is on the United Nations lists of terrorist organizations ... so why should we be surprised when Washington previously signed what it called a “peace” agreement with the American-classified Taliban movement on the list of terrorism After two decades of a fierce war on the Afghan people, hundreds of thousands of Afghans have lost their lives?
Where is Al Qaeda today?
There is no doubt that it is bringing about ISIS, al-Nusra and Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, and it will have new names in the future according to American interests and Washington’s plans, which are primarily responsible for the emergence of terrorist organizations in the world, feeding and training them to fight their political opponents wherever they are, and when it ends Their role is to change their features by entering the make-up room to change their wigs, name and mission.
The United States' classification did not prevent the Afghan Taliban movement on the list of terrorism and topped it in the list of the most dangerous terrorist organizations in the world in the annual census of the US State Department in 2015, defeating the terrorist organization "ISIS", it did not prevent it from sitting at the negotiating table and signing a "peace" agreement with the movement Last year and describe it historical
Why did Washington sign an agreement with the Taliban?
Has the movement’s ideology and ideology changed, or did the new interests of Washington require the Taliban to wear a new robe to sign a “peace” agreement that Washington mobilized representatives of 30 countries and international organizations, including representatives of the United Nations and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, in the presence of its foreign minister.
Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton admitted that the United States created the terrorist organization "ISIS" to be used in Iraq and Syria. During his first election campaign, President Donald Trump did not hesitate to explicitly say that President Barack Obama is the founder of "ISIS" and that Hillary Clinton His partner in command.
Today, the United States, through its media, polishes and rotates the Julani terrorist, the leader of Jabhat al-Nusra, which changed its name to (Hayat Tahrir al-Sham) according to a plan sponsored and promoted by both Washington and Ankara, to reintroduce him in a new outfit, a wig and a tie in preparation for use in other missions.
This plan to reproduce Al-Julani was evident through his interviews with the American media in Idlib and his speech that his organization “does not pose any threat to the United States and that he never intends to target it or Europe,” and that what he is doing “reflects the group's common interests with the United States.”
What al-Julani said was confirmed by James Jeffrey, who served as ambassador during the era of the Republican and Democratic administrations and a special US envoy to Syria, when he said that the Golani organization constitutes an asset to Washington’s strategy in Idlib, which he considered one of the most important areas in Syria and the Middle East for the United States.
There is no doubt that Al-Julani, which Washington placed on the list of international terrorism in 2012, is just the name and organization of the organizations that it uses, whether in Syria or in other countries to achieve its interests and impose its political agendas, and this policy is not far from what Washington is doing at the Al-Tanf base in which it maintains cells of the organization The terrorist ISIS it claims is fighting.
It does not matter what international and local organizations have documented about the crimes of (Jabhat al-Nusra - Hayat Tahrir al-Sham), led by al-Julani, against the Syrians, in which dozens of innocent civilians were killed. What matters to Washington is that it has tools to achieve its interests across the world, whether these tools are governments, terrorist organizations, or intelligence agencies And the rotation process will continue and continue vigorously, especially after the US administration adopted a policy of proxies and tools instead of direct involvement through its armies.