Blame it on five LR deputies!
The argument is convenient.
To hear the supporters of euthanasia and assisted suicide, it is because of the mountain of amendments tabled by five elected Republicans that Parliament would be deprived of a debate and a necessary vote on the end of life .
Obstruction has always been a stopgap.
But it is strange to hear the signatories of the Falorni bill being indignant at a technique that they themselves have used, some to prevent the reform of the SNCF statute.
Jean-Luc Mélenchon then explained that a war of amendments was the only way for a minority to impose a debate that the majority would like to avoid.
To read also:
Michel Houellebecq: "A civilization which legalizes euthanasia loses all right to respect"
In this case, who really wants the debate?
The method and the timetable chosen invite us to ask ourselves the question.
The characteristic of a "niche" reserved for legislative proposals, that is to say for texts presented by deputies and not by the government, is to have a limited discussion period.
But, besides the same group
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 76% left to discover.
Subscribe: 1 € the first month
Can be canceled at any time
I ENJOY IT
Already subscribed?
Log in