The United States of America, Britain and France succeeded in the process of falsification of facts, intense propaganda, blackmail and pressure on many countries to obtain an anti-Syrian resolution at the 25th Conference of the Member States of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, after a series of reports in which the organization’s employees relied on fabricated evidence and opinions. Eyewitnesses “do not amount to be adopted or used as evidence and evidence in the worst courts of the world.
In late 2019, the British newspaper "Daily Mail" reported that a scientist employed by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons said in a leaked email: “Investigations on the ground in Douma in Rural Damascus in April 2018 did not reach strong evidence about the alleged gas attack, and that it was hidden. The facts are deliberately included in the organization's reports, and that the evidence gathered in Douma and examined does not support the version of the report that the organization officially adopted, and that the organization reformulated the report to the extent that its conclusions were distorted.
The e-mail confirms that the official report of independent scientists about the Douma incident imposed heavy censorship on him and was shortened to the point of misrepresenting the facts by leaving key information and concealing the fact that traces of chlorine that were allegedly found on the site were just tiny elements, at a rate of parts per billion, and in forms that can be found. In any household bleaching materials, and that the report concealed a complete mismatch between the symptoms that the victims showed at the scene of the accident and the effects of the chemicals that were actually found, as the symptoms that appear in the videos simply do not match the symptoms that could have occurred due to any substance. Present at the site.
In the report on Douma, the organization considered that there are "logical motives to say that a chemical agent was used as a weapon on April 7, 2018" during the attack on Douma in the eastern Ghouta of Damascus, and that "this chemical element contained chlorine gas."
After another report on an alleged attack also in Al-Lataminah in Hama in March 2017, Santiago Onatti Laborde, head of the investigation committee set up by the members of the organization, said in a statement: “There are reasonable grounds to believe that the users of sarin as a chemical weapon in Al-Lataminah on March 24 and 30, 2017, and the use of chlorine as a chemical weapon in March 25, 2017 are members of the Syrian Air Force, ”without mentioning the source of this information, which is usually very confidential. However, press reports stated that the source of this information is media reports in addition to the so-called“ Syrian Observatory for Human Rights ”which It is run by one person residing in London.
In another report, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) said: It has reasonable grounds to believe that “the Syrian Air Force” dropped a chlorine gas bomb on a residential neighborhood in the city of Saraqib, Idlib, in February 2018, wounding 12 people, and these “reasonable reasons” were built. The testimonies of the "White Helmets" organization, which has been proven by unequivocal evidence of its close association with terrorist organizations, and the support it receives from Western intelligence, and based on the above, the most heinous atrocities have been committed against Syrians in various parts of Syria.
In the wake of media reports and videos also published by the "White Helmets" about a chemical attack in Khan Sheikhoun, Idlib, the fact-finding mission of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) said in a report issued by it: that people in Khan Sheikhoun area in Idlib countryside were exposed on April 4 to sarin, and it acknowledged For security reasons, the fact-finding mission was unable to visit Khan Sheikhoun, but its team attended “autopsies, collecting vital medical samples of injuries and deaths, interrogating witnesses, and receiving environmental samples” in a neighboring country, without naming him, and she means Turkey Which was one of the largest supporter of terrorists during the war on Syria.
“Rational motives” in Douma, “reasonable grounds for belief” in Al-Lataminah, “reasonable grounds for belief” in Saraqib, and “testimonies and samples” from Turkey in Khan Sheikhoun are clear examples of how the reports of this organization are built, how it works, and extract the conclusions that It serves the plans of the major Western countries and achieves their interests, so that the machines of the governments of those media countries, their political teams, and their cheap tools will then work on adopting these “reports” to release statements that prove the conclusions contained in the reports as “absolute facts” that they are based on as a new tool to target the Syrian people, and to continue to support Their terrorist organizations to restore life to them in a way that guarantees the continuation of the war so that they continue to try to exploit the opportunities to achieve their interests.
José Boustany, the OPCW's first director-general, says in a statement prepared for his reading at the Security Council revealing the OPCW's cover-up of important facts in the suspected chemical attack in Douma, “If the allegations are the removal of evidence, the selective use of data and the exclusion of the principal investigators. “Among other well-founded allegations, it is absolutely imperative that this issue be dealt with openly and urgently.
This organization has already reached the zenith of greatness.
And if it has slipped, it still has the potential to repair itself, and grow to be bigger.
The world needs a reliable control body for chemical weapons, but the same countries that prepared the decision to punish Syria based on the reports of the Chemical Weapons Organization, namely the United States, Britain and France, prevented Boustani from speaking before the Security Council, and this in itself is additional evidence to prove the politicization of these countries' work. This organization is using its reports to achieve their interests.
