• news

• Political-political

President of the Supreme Court to Netanyahu's representative: The ombudsman's opinion is binding

The judges will discuss the appointments after the heated debate earlier in the cabinet meeting, and will discuss in particular the appointment of a justice minister.

Prior to the hearing, the ombudsman sent his official position that the government should be required to appoint a justice minister immediately. Netanyahu is represented at the hearing by a private lawyer, after requesting separate representation.

Tags

• Benjamin Netanyahu

• High Court

• Minister of Justice

Yaki Adamkar

Tuesday, 27 April 2021, 18:50 Updated: 19:18

• Share on Facebook

• Share on WhatsApp

• Share on general

• Share on general

• Share on Twitter

• Share on Email

0 comments

• After the clashes in Jerusalem: The police commissioner ordered the removal ...

• "Justice for Sarah Halimi": Thousands demonstrate in Paris against the decision ...

• A trick for renewing a non-stick pan

• India breaks another record in the number of infected and dead and in the world ...

• Corona eruption in Pardes Hanna - Karkur: "Annoying that ...

• Johnson denies: I did not say I prefer a pile of corpses over ...

• Three rockets were launched from the Gaza Strip into Israeli territory, two of them ...

• MK Miki Zohar announced the establishment of a committee on Arab affairs ...

• Flowering incendiary balloons from the Gaza Strip to Israel, April 26, 2021

• Sderot residents are preparing for a tense night and are afraid of resuming shooting ...

• The US population has grown in the past decade at the second rate most ...

In the video: Netanyahu claims that Gantz withdrew from the agreements and despite this, he asks the High Court for an extension to appoint a justice minister (Photo: Likud spokeswoman)

The High Court hearing began on the issue of the appointment of permanent ministers in the government, including the appointment of a justice minister, after the stormy debate in the government today (Tuesday). Benjamin Netanyahu is represented at the hearing by a private lawyer, after requesting separate representation from the ombudsman. The hearing is due to a petition by the Movement for Quality of Government, and is being conducted before Supreme Court President Esther Hayut and Justices Neil Handel and Uzi Vogelman.

"We asked for today's hearing to be considered as if conditional orders had already been issued, things are getting even more valid in light of the updated announcement we received from the ombudsman," said Adv. Eliad Shraga, from the Movement for Quality of Government, illegal. "We also requested an interim injunction, which would effectively prevent Mr. Akunis from taking office, in light of the fact that as the appointment was alleged to be null and void."

Shraga proposed returning the powers of the Minister of Justice to Blue and White Chairman Bnei Gantz: "I think these are super exceptional circumstances that the Honorable Court will be forced to ... issue an interim constitutional order so that the same powers in the hands of Justice Minister Gantz remain in his hands until a decision is made. Other.

So that gap can be filled, until a verdict is handed down. "

More on Walla!

Mandelblit to the High Court: There is no alternative but to oblige the government to appoint a Minister of Justice

To the full article

The High Court hearing around the appointments, today (Photo: Flash 90, Yonatan Zindel)

Advocate David Peter of the Ecclesiastical Forum, representing Netanyahu at the hearing, argued that there was a problem with the privatization mechanism set for the government. "The executive has not established such a mechanism," he told the judges.

Judge Vogelman replied: "So the provisions of the Basic Law are emptied of content because no mechanism has been established at the level of a government statute, which is to some degree below the Basic Law ... This is a somewhat radical view."

Pets

: Is raising the justice minister on the recommendation of the Prime Minister's explanation was put on the agenda in agreement?

Attorney Peter

: Yeah ... say it would be a discussion in accordance with the decision of the court to appoint a justice minister, without specifying the name

of animals

: Attorney General says Sarah "M gave his consent to raise Gantz's name, however when the Prime Minister asked to put the name of Minister Akunis, Gantz expressed opposition to the existence of a

lawyer."D. Peter

: The government mechanism clearly raises an issue on the agenda ...

Judge Esther Hayut at the hearing, today (Photo: Flash 90, Yonatan Zindel)

"There is a legal obligation to appoint a Justice Minister immediately, and in accordance with this and a conditional order issued on April 22, there is no escape from issuing an absolute order directing the government to fill the post of Justice Minister in the 35th government without delay," Mandelblit wrote in an earlier letter to the High Court.

• Share on Facebook

• Share on WhatsApp

• Share on general

• Share on general

• Share on Twitter

• Share on Email

0 comments