The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Mathieu Bock-Côté: "What political philosophy for the right?"

2021-05-14T23:11:14.605Z


CHRONICLE - To oppose the various movements which express their aversion to Western civilization, the French right must take an Aronian bet.


Raymond Aron, undoubtedly the most important political philosopher of the second half of the XXth century, knew, in his time, to make an incisive criticism of Marxism, which subjugated the intelligentsia, and which he saw as a secular religion.

He took his thinkers seriously and made the bet to read them in order to decipher them.

Not that he allowed himself to be dazzled by their convoluted intellectual constructions, but since the Marxists were ideologues determined to reconstruct the world by subjecting it to their theories, it was better to know what future they were preparing for us.

To discover

  • Michel Houellebecq: "A civilization which legalizes euthanasia loses all rights to respect"

Ideas rule the world.

More exactly, ideologues rule the world, especially the modern world, insofar as they have, thanks to the administrative apparatus of the therapeutic state, a political instrument allowing permanent social engineering, in the name of the deconstruction of human rights. “Prejudices” of the population.

Read also:

Gender theory, decolonialism, racialism ... These new dogmas which want to impose themselves in France

Aron made it his duty to confront communism intellectually by deconstructing its

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 79% left to discover.

Subscribe: 1 € the first month

Can be canceled at any time

I ENJOY IT

Already subscribed?

Log in

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2021-05-14

You may like

Life/Entertain 2024-02-20T16:02:29.350Z

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-04-18T09:29:37.790Z
News/Politics 2024-04-18T11:17:37.535Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.