Political situation
Written by: Zhou Haoyi
2021-05-14 11:38
Last update date: 2021-05-14 11:38
In response to the substantial increase in complaints received from judges in recent years, the Judiciary recommends that the current complaint handling mechanism for judges be changed to a "two-tier system" starting from the third quarter of this year. More than one high court judges formed a task force to follow up; the second level established an advisory committee, chaired by the Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal, with judges and members of the public serving as members, to review the investigation report submitted by the task force and give opinions.
The Legislative Council Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services discussed the relevant proposals this morning (14th). The Chief Executive of the Judiciary, Leung Yuet-hsien, said that the number of complaints received from judges has increased significantly in recent years. A total of 5,559 complaints have been processed, and some of them have caused widespread publicity. Concerned and hoped that a "two-tier system" could be introduced to enhance the public accountability and transparency of the mechanism.
Many members asked the Judiciary to account for the number of members of the community in the advisory committee. Leung Yuexian said that the proportion of members of the community in the advisory committee is small, but it will ensure that the appointed person does not have a political background.
Members are concerned about who constitutes the advisory committee Leung Yuexian: appointed by the Chief Justice
The New Democrat Party chairman Ye Liu Shuyi is concerned about who will serve as members of the advisory committee. The DAB also asked the judiciary to clarify who will appoint members of the public on the advisory committee and how to decide whether a case is complicated or arouses widespread public concern.
Leung Yuexian responded that the members of the public on the advisory committee are appointed by the Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal. Since the advisory committee needs a considerable proportion of people to be familiar with legal procedures, there are more judges and a smaller percentage of members of the public, but the Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal It will appoint individuals who do not have any political background, and are independent and credible in their professional and public positions.
Leung Yuexian said that the Judiciary has a dedicated secretariat to receive complaints from judges and make a preliminary assessment of whether it is necessary to deal with complaints. It will then be judged by a panel of dedicated judges composed of judges from the High Court. If it is a serious case, it will be referred to the advisory committee for processing, and then the final judgment The chief judge of the judge makes the decision.
She said that if the case is judged to be unnecessary or minor, a report will also be submitted to the advisory committee.
The Chief of Administration of the Judiciary, Leung Yuexian, stated that the number of complaints received from judges has increased significantly in recent years. A total of 5,559 complaints have been processed. Some of them have attracted widespread attention from the community. It is hoped that a "two-tier system" can be introduced to enhance the public accountability of the mechanism. And transparency.
(Screenshot of the live broadcast of the Legislative Council)
The Judiciary proposes a two-tier system to handle complaints from judges. The public can participate in the advisory committee to review the report
The Judiciary Advocates a Two-tier System for Handling Judges' Complaints Zhou Haoding and Ge Peifan Welcome Suggestions: Increase Transparency
Judiciary: Anti-amendment cases involving 1,752 cases, 65% have been closed, and it is difficult to set up a special case team to hear
The overseas judge of the final court said that if the rule of law is damaged, Lam Cheng will leave Hong Kong, rebutting: Hong Kong's judicial system is still stable
01News
Judiciary