The UN General Assembly is called on Tuesday to approve a draft non-binding resolution providing for
“an immediate suspension”
of the transfer of arms to Burma and its military leaders, we learned at the United Nations on Sunday.
Initiated by Liechtenstein, with the support in particular of the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States,
"the project will be submitted to a plenary meeting in person"
at 19h GMT, a spokesperson told AFP. word of the Organization.
Read also: Burma: the junta blocks the internet and restricts access to information
According to diplomats, approval by consensus is not achieved, in which case the Assembly would proceed to a vote.
The challenge will then be to garner as much support as possible among the 193 Member States of the General Assembly.
In negotiation for weeks, the text is co-sponsored by 48 countries in Europe, America, Africa, a single country, South Korea, representing Asia in this group.
Non-binding unlike Security Council resolutions but with strong political significance, the text provides for
"an immediate suspension of the supply, sale or direct and indirect transfer of all arms, ammunition and other military equipment to Burma "
. He calls on the Burmese military authorities who took power on February 1 during a coup
"to put an end to the state of emergency"
and
"to immediately cease all violence against peaceful demonstrators"
. He also calls on them
"to release immediately and unconditionally"
President Win Myint and civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi, as well as all those arbitrarily detained.
The project also calls on
"Burma to implement without delay"
the plan towards a return to democracy drawn up by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN),
"to facilitate without delay a visit of the UN envoy ”
, banned from entering the country until now, and allowing
“ safe and unhindered humanitarian access ”.
The demand for an arms embargo is a long-standing wish of several dozen NGOs.
At the Security Council, which unanimously adopted since February four declarations on Burma, each time watered down by China in particular, the idea of adopting such a measure, which would probably entail a veto from Beijing, did not never been advanced.