As Paul Quilès said after the victory of Mitterrand in 1981 about the heads which were to
"fall"
one could say: it is not enough to say that the reforms will resume; you have to say which ones, and say it quickly. This is true par excellence for this retirement project that Emmanuel Macron puts back on the job. The alternative is known: relaunching this suspended project with the first confinement is to prove that the five-year term is not at a standstill until its expiry of 2022, it is to demonstrate that macronism remains synonymous with reformism; but it is threatening to provoke new social anger, to awaken concerns in a country emerging from a long trauma. In short, is resetting the pension reform, is it giving itself the means to relaunch France, by starting to get it out of the deadly spiral of the deterioration of public finances? Or is it taking the risk of blocking it again,a second failure then preventing any action for a long time
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 71% left to discover.
Subscribe: 1 € the first month
Cancellable at any time
I ENJOY IT
Already subscribed?
Log in