The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Lu Wenduan: There are only two options for the Stake to dissolve or ban. Deleting the slogan does not change the nature of "subversion"

2021-06-08T06:28:43.539Z


The Stake Association's June 4th rallies were once again banned this year, and its slogan "End the One-Party Dictatorship" was also accused by the establishment of inconsistent with the "National Security Law." Lu Wenduan, vice chairman of the All-China Federation of Returned Overseas Chinese, wrote an article in the newspaper today (7)


Political situation

Written by: Lin Jian

2021-06-07 11:01

Last update date: 2021-06-07 11:01

The Stake Association's June 4th rallies were once again banned this year, and its slogan "End the One-Party Dictatorship" was also accused by the establishment of inconsistent with the "National Security Law."

Lu Wenduan, vice chairman of the All-China Federation of Returned Overseas Chinese, wrote in a newspaper today (7th) that even if the stake deletes the slogan of "Ending One-Party Dictatorship", it will not be possible to change the nature of the stake’s "subversive organization." The National Security Law The environment also does not allow "Save Stake".

He believes that there are only two options for the stake at present: disband or be banned, and the law enforcement agency’s attitude is to "blame the stakes". "If the stakes dissolve on their own, the pan-democrats in the stakes believe that they will" safe and sound"."

▼The first June 4th under the National Security Law▼

+3

+3

+3

Thinking that deleting the slogan can save it is "politically incorrect"

Lu Wenduan pointed out that after experiencing the "color revolutions" in many countries, we can see more clearly that the "Beijing storm" (referring to the June 4th incident) that happened that year was essentially a failed "color revolution." The stakes derived from the turmoil are essentially a "color revolution" organization." He mentioned that the democracy of the stakes is what the West refers to as the "multi-party system." The name of the organization goes to the "Five Outlines". "Every sentence is aimed at the ruling position of the Chinese Communist Party. It is essentially in the name of "democracy" and "subverts the basic system of the Communist Party led by the Constitution."

He believes that simply deleting the phrase "end the one-party dictatorship" can change the nature of the stake’s “subversive organization.” The statement is too naive. From history to reality, it has always been a subversive organization that opposes the leadership of the Communist Party. It is impossible to just delete one of the slogans and continue to preserve it. If this is done, it is not allowed by the National Security Law, and it is also politically incorrect. Next, the stake has only two options: either dissolve it on its own or ban it in accordance with the law."

Lu Wenduan, vice chairman of the All-China Federation of Returned Overseas Chinese.

(Profile picture)

Citing the primary election case means self-dissolution can avoid imprisonment

Lu Wenduan believes that the current law enforcement agencies' attitude towards the stake is "bearing the past." If it dissolves on its own, it is believed that the pan-democrats in the club will be "safe and safe." However, when the law enforcement agencies ban it, the pan-democrats in the stake will People may face accountability issues involving joining a subversive organization that violates the National Security Law. "The actual consequences are hard to tell."

He mentioned that in the Democrats’ 35+ primaries, most of the people involved were not allowed to be released on bail due to violations of the National Security Law. This is a "serious warning sign."

In the end, Lu Wenduan called on "insightful pan-democrats" to push for the dissolution of the stake as soon as possible.

"This will not only "protect" the pan-democrats who want to continue to develop in Hong Kong's political arena, but also allow them to "decently" cut their association with the stakes and avoid the "choice dilemma" of whether to withdraw."

Cai Yaochang: Political risks have always existed

Stake Secretary Tsai Yiu-chang responded to the TV and TV program that it is not the first or second time for pro-China people to threaten the Stake by writing articles or other methods. This situation has indeed become more and more serious recently.

He pointed out that the stakes have always adhered to the commemoration of the history of June 4th and the pursuit of truth and justice. He described this as "being shocked and unchanging." He also mentioned that political risks have always existed. Since 1989, the stakes have been It is often accused of being a "subversive organization."

June 4th 32 | Stake Vice Chairman Zou Xingtong was arrested by the police for violating public security regulations

June 4th 32︱01 News: China Association for Democracy and People's Association withdraws from stake party members, hoping that district councillors will swear an oath of safety

He Junren clarified: Zhang Wenguang has no suggestion to dissolve the stake is only "one of many possibilities"

Tang Jiahua: The stake will have a chance to be banned if it proves to be a common intention to wear black clothes alone, it can also break the law

01News

Lu Wenduan's June 4th Stakes Hong Kong Version of the National Security Law

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2021-06-08

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.