Social News
Written by: Lu Leqian
2021-06-09 19:49
Last update date: 2021-06-09 19:49
The information technology manager allegedly accused the police officer who was obstructing the road for "successful trash". He was charged with making public noises. The case opened today (9th) in the Eastern District Court. The defendant argued that a female student was harassed at the time. He lodged a complaint with the police It was ignored, but the magistrate believed that his statement was untrue and believed that the police officers did not dare to accuse the defendant who came to lodge a complaint in full view. The defendant was found guilty and the case was postponed until June 18 and sentenced. pen.
The defendant applied to Zheng Guan for bail and went out pending appeal twice, but Zheng Guan refused.
The defendant, Chen Hao Lun (34), was charged with one count of making noise in a public place. He accused him of repeatedly and continuously criticizing police officers in public places outside HSBC at 341-343 Chai Wan Road on November 11 last year. Intent to inspire others to destroy the peace of society.
The prosecutor's accusation took up to 5 minutes
When the case went to trial this morning, the magistrate Zheng Jihang took the initiative to suggest that the evidence showed that the time for the defendant to be accused of scolding the police should be 5 minutes, and the 3 minutes for the crime of row charge, and asked the prosecution whether the content of the charge needs to be amended.
The lawyer representing the defendant once objected and believed that the defendant was unfair, but Zheng Guan finally approved the amendment to the content of the charge.
The defendant later fired his lawyer and turned to defend himself.
Official Zheng later explained that the defense's defense mainly focused on the defendant's act of scolding the police officer, rather than the length of time of the scolding, so he believed that the amendment of the charge did not unfairly treat the defendant.
The police officer accused the defendant of inciting others to rush out of the road
The prosecution plan refers to the fact that the police officers dealt with road blockages near Chai Wan Road and Yi Tai Street in the morning. The crowd of onlookers kept chanting slogans and insulting police officers. Among them, the defendant was the most excited and kept calling: "Dead Black Police" and "Sheng Shi Zhi Zhi". Rubbish," and incited others to rush out of the road.
The police officer therefore warned the defendant, but the defendant was arrogant and continued to shout, "Shoot." The police officer stepped forward and tried to arrest the defendant. The defendant turned and fled. In the end, several police officers crushed the defendant to the ground.
The defendant argued that he complained that the man in gray harassed the girl
The defendant argued that on the way to work that day, he saw a gray-clothed man arguing with two female students. He walked across the road to warn the gray-clothed man, and complained to the police: "You are wrong. Uncle disturbs the student girl." Then he said: "(The man in gray) is going to X, and you are going to be wild again." The police officer responded, "Ah Sir, being wild and X makes you teach and teach. If you mess up with your family, you will get X." The defendant insisted that he did not stir the emotions of the people present, but was dissatisfied that the police did not enforce the law.
Accept the police officer's statement
Zheng Guan ruled that the two police officers were both honest and reliable. Although they did not actually record the slogans called by the defendant in their journals, they added some details to their statements, and they remembered more after being cross-examined by the defense. The details are not surprising, so they accept their testimony in their entirety.
Alleged that the defendant lied
On the contrary, Zheng Guan believes that the defendant’s statements are exaggerated and inaccurate, lied, and sophistry, alleging that the defendant did not know what happened between the gray-clothed man and the two female students that day. From the fragments, we can see that the female student has the upper hand in the dispute and keeps crying. Yi Nan: "You are gone," "You are brave enough to port my school." The Gray Yi finally left the scene.
Zheng Guan pointed out that the defendant's questioning of the gray-clothed man without any explanation was unfounded, and it was not justified to go to help.
The defendant was chased and fled
In addition, there were 8 to 10 riot police officers on duty near the two female students at that time. The defendant did not complain to them or stop the gray-clothed man from leaving. Instead, he went around and scolded the police officer involved in the case. When the police pursued him , He fled even further.
Official Zheng questioned that if what the defendant said was true, police officers would never dare to accuse the defendant who came to lodge a complaint in full view, and the defendant did not have to flee. It can be seen that his statement was absolutely unreliable and the defendant was found guilty.
Case Number: ESCC 756/2020
The boy in Mong Kok clamored for obstruction of traffic, the official said that if the sentence is lighter or impose other procedures for 3 weeks in prison
The autistic man scolded the police and other arrested defendants alleges that the defendant was repeatedly slapped to refuse to admit his confession after being arrested
Accountant said he wanted to scare people to throw dry ice cola bottles at the police station and pleaded guilty to prisoners for 4 months
Airport Conflict | Two men convicted of yelling and throwing objects at police
01News
Blocking roads, disrupting order, court hearings related to the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance