At the Bygmalion trial, which opened on May 20 and is due to end on Tuesday, black holes are swallowing the truth.
Some defendants select the memory loss that suits them, while others offer the court leaked confessions of which crucial information.
Who gave the order, in early 2012, to deflate the cost of Nicolas Sarkozy's second presidential campaign to make the UMP (now Les Républicains) pay a good deal through fictitious conventions and, thus, make people believe that the legal ceiling of 22 million euros would not be pulverized in May?
And when: from the start of the campaign, which would signify a cynical premeditation, or
"over the water",
when it had become obvious that the legal envelope would not be enough?
No one says it.
All, perhaps, know it.
Read also:
At the Bygmalion trial, Nicolas Sarkozy pleads for sobriety
The successive days of hearings create the horrifying feeling that the truth is at hand but will never emerge.
The debates, locked by irreconcilable postures,
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 89% left to discover.
To cultivate your freedom is to cultivate your curiosity.
Continue reading your article for € 1 the first month
I ENJOY IT
Already subscribed?
Log in