At a time when the greening objectives of the future common agricultural policy (CAP) are being fiercely negotiated, it has been singled out for its lack of impact on global warming in recent years.
According to a report by the European Court of Auditors, the massive subsidies from Brussels in agriculture have failed to reduce the sector's CO2 emissions.
Despite some 100 billion euros allocated to the fight against climate change (almost a quarter of the CAP budget) between 2014 and 2020, greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, which represent 10% of the European total, did not decrease over the period.
To read also:
The fight of the agricultural sectors to share the manna of the CAP
Half of these emissions come from breeding, especially cattle, whose herds have not decreased.
The report of the wise men of Luxembourg questions a policy that promotes breeding and meat consumption and recommends setting a reduction in figures per country.
In addition, emissions due to chemical fertilizers and effluents increased between 2010 and 2018, say listeners.
They believe that the impact on greenhouse gas emissions of
"practices that may reduce the use of fertilizers, such as organic farming and the cultivation of pulses",
is not established.
The Court of Auditors pleads for more transparency on the annual emission reduction targets set by country, which the Brussels Commission refuses.
It also calls for the establishment of an incentive policy for farmers, based on the polluter pays principle.
Agriculture: tractors parade on the motorway near Strasbourg against the future CAP - Watch on Figaro Live
While the Green Deal decreed by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen aims to reduce emissions by at least 55% by 2030, and achieve climate neutrality by 2050,
“the European Union has a crucial role to play in taking action on climate change in the agricultural sector ”,
underlines Viorel Stefan, author of the report. However, it points to a lack of ambition in the objectives of the new CAP.