If some texts are as media-friendly as they are useless, this one is as useful as it is invisible.
It is not the so-called 4D law - decentralization, differentiation, deconcentration and decomplexification - which will bring crowds into the streets or cause heated debates on the platforms of the news channels.
And for good reason: it is not a law of display, but of adjustment.
It is a toolbox intended to improve the articulation between the State and the different territorial levels.
The objective is laudable and the discussion promises to be more technical than political, apart from the criticisms expected on the theme "the account is not there".
To read also:
Bill 4D: to prove to the “territories” that they are not forgotten by the reform
But, as the Senate took up the subject the day after territorial elections marked by a record abstention, the gap is striking between a democratic crisis of unprecedented magnitude and this work of adjustment.
Of course, the purpose of the 4D law is not to settle the question of abstention.
But the lack of legibility and intelligibility of communities
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 73% left to discover.
To cultivate your freedom is to cultivate your curiosity.
Continue reading your article for € 1 the first month
I ENJOY IT
Already subscribed?
Log in
