Duchess Meghan apparently did not sign the birth certificate of daughter Lilibet with her royal name.
Another pointer in the direction of the royal family?
London - It was a story the Hollywood dream factory couldn't have written better.
The actress from Los Angeles falls in love with the Prince from Great Britain and what seems so contradicting at first glance comes together.
Meghan Markle became Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and perhaps the most exciting chapter of the British monarchy in years began.
Duchess Meghan waives her royal name on Lilibet's birth certificate
This was followed by the birth of son Archie, the Megxit, who reached its climax in the now famous Oprah interview, and just under a month ago the birth of Lilibet Diana, the second child of Meghan and Harry.
As it has now become known, the 39-year-old has set an example as part of the birth of her daughter and further distanced herself from the British royal family.
It is about the birth certificate of little Lilibet, which could again provide a lot of fuel in the British royal family.
According to reports from the US magazine
People
and the portal
TMZ
, who have the birth certificate,
Meghan is said to
have refrained from signing her official title "Her Royal Highness, Duchess Meghan of Sussex".
Instead, she signed the document with her maiden name Rachel Meghan Markle.
Harry and Meghan: aftermath of Megxit - a clear sign against the British royal family?
Harry, however, signed the birth certificate as usual with "His Royal Highness the Duke of Sussex".
When son Archie was born in May 2019, Meghan also signed her royal name and title.
The fact that Meghan used her real name at Lilibet is mainly surprising because, despite the Megxit, it was decided that Harry and Meghan should keep the title HRH (His / Her Royal Highness), even if they are no longer allowed to use it. Meghan's conscious decision against her royal title could therefore also be understood as a further clear demarcation from the British royal family.
(fd)
