The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Health pass: "A profound and unprecedented questioning of our model of society"

2021-07-14T19:30:25.325Z


TRIBUNE - For the philosopher and MEP François-Xavier Bellamy, as well as for the vice-president of the Centrists Loïc Hervé, the fact that access to public space is conditioned on the presentation of health data is a historic break. The infringement of freedoms ...


To discover

  • Michel Houellebecq: "A civilization which legalizes euthanasia loses all rights to respect"

François-Xavier Bellamy is a philosopher and MEP.

Loïc Hervé is vice-president of the Centrists.

Since the appearance of the coronavirus, we have gone through many unprecedented experiences, and we have seen wavering, from confinement to curfew, the reassuring and illusory evidence of our public freedoms.

But do not be mistaken: the real historic break for our model of society dates from last Monday, with the measures announced by the President of the Republic.

If we opposed, several months ago, the creation of the health pass by the European Parliament and the French Parliament, it is because we absolutely reject the world that is emerging before our eyes.

Read also:

Is it legal to condition access to public places to the health pass?

A clarification first, in the confusion and caricatures of the moment: to oppose the health pass is not to be anti-vaccine.

Vaccination is a prodigious scientific progress, and one of the most beautiful pages in the history of our country is undoubtedly to have made a significant contribution to it through

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 85% left to discover.

Freedom is also to go to the end of a debate.

Continue reading your article for € 1 for 2 months

I ENJOY IT

Already subscribed?

Log in

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2021-07-14

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.