Sharp criticism of Aiwanger;
Front page, Fear Isn't a Good Advisor;
Readers' forum July 31st / April 1st
August
I would like to express my greatest respect that, thank God, there are still politicians like Mr Aiwanger, who is committed to people's self-determination and also stands by it!
It must be made clear that it is absolutely legitimate to present not only the benefits but also the risks based on facts as part of the Covid 19 vaccination campaign.
In my opinion, both politics and the media are even obliged to do so.
I miss this fact-based comparison very much in the current reporting and in the appearances of politicians. In a free country every person has to weigh things up for himself and then be able and allowed to decide for or against a vaccination without being tamed and socially marginalized by the advocates of the vaccination. Furthermore, it is very shameful that politicians like Mr. Schäuble and Mr. Scholz are increasingly calling for acquaintances and friends to be persuaded to be vaccinated with a vaccine that is only partially approved. The side effects that have actually already occurred are not mentioned at all. This approach only drives wedges into families and groups of friends and is unbearable! As a civilized society we cannot allowthat people are defamed and socially marginalized just because they decide against a risky intervention in their body. We all know where it can lead when governments proactively foment such exclusion and thus legitimize it.
Christian Schmaus
Siegsdorf
It is unbelievable what Hubert Aiwanger can afford. He even invokes his basic rights. Markus Söder would do well to denounce his behavior. He shows responsibility for the citizen. For all citizens. The government expects the responsible citizen to accept the Corona regulations wholeheartedly. The intelligent citizens get vaccinated. Thanks for that, restrictions almost like in lockdown. I am in favor of a general vaccination requirement. Especially to protect the children, who are still almost completely unprotected. Unvaccinated and unwilling adults must be penalized with appropriate sanctions. To be clear, this is not about non-vaccinated people for medical reasons. The best way to do this is through your wallet, so the stupid ones will feel that too. Anyone who hopes for the votes of these voters is completely out of place as a citizen representative.
Gaby Gerstner
Wartenberg
The infantile hacking at Hubert Aiwanger slowly takes on disgusting features. In criminology, something like this is called “significant stressfulness”. I perceive him as a serious person who may be underestimated intellectually. He only resorts to the basic rights of physical integrity and freedom of expression. Like any other injection, a vaccination initially constitutes bodily harm in accordance with Section 223 of the Criminal Code. This “silent criminal offense” is repealed with the consent of the person being vaccinated or the patient. It can be assumed that Aiwanger's anti-vaccination stance is not a flimsy election campaign polemic, but is the result of fact-based knowledge. Furthermore, you get a bad feeling when "vaccinating to go" at gas stations,Flea markets and motorway service stations are for sale. Carefully considered, vaccination is an invasive medical procedure that requires a certain milieu. In addition, it has almost bizarre traits with the smell of the dubious when customers are attracted for these mass vaccinations with free beer, currywurst and bouncy castles for the little ones. Has something of a child's birthday feeling. Conclusion: Hubert Aiwanger with his justified attitude certainly does not want to go on an election campaign cuddle course in the direction of the lateral thinker scene. It is apparently only based on facts that shadow the Covid-19 vaccination strategy like a dark cloud from the start: the extremely short vaccine development time and the absolute lack of long-term experience with regard to the duration of effectiveness,Effectiveness and individual side effects.
Walter Krause
Poecking
Ms. Wilke writes what you hear from young and old now and again in different variations: “My body belongs to me. I know what is good for him ”. This begs the question of who “I” actually is. An immortal soul that has put on this body like a dress, as the ancient Greeks said, or is it, together with our supposed free will, simply a deception of our brain, as some neurologists speculate? Either way, it is advisable for our ego to make use of the numerous neurons in our own brain. In this case: Let's ask ourselves why Mr Aiwanger is so openly discussing his refusal to vaccinate in public. Of course, because he wants to get all of our real / supposed selves to put our cross with his party on election day. And what happens,what if the fourth lockdown overtakes us in winter, given the lack of herd immunity? Then Mr. Aiwanger will look good again because he makes himself the lawyer and spokesman for the many bankrupt companies. Our bodies, which we don't want to take on two pikes, are allowed to guard the apartment with us again. At least we are not at home alone, but in intimate togetherness.
Dr.
Georg Glonner
Munich
It is a responsible citizen's right to decide whether to get vaccinated.
But what the Deputy Prime Minister is publicly disseminating here makes me doubt his sanity.
Is he only after the wrong votes where he gets a terrible slap.
Söder should finally show Aiwanger the red card, because so much damage that Aiwanger causes with his opinion is detrimental to the vaccination campaign.
I have already been vaccinated twice myself and cannot understand how one refuses to vaccinate.
Detlef Schad
Munich
The Council of Europe, to which all European states belong and which is the sponsor of the European Court of Human Rights, decided on January 27, 2021 in its resolution 2361/2021, among other things, that no one may be vaccinated against their will under pressure. The 47 Member States are asked to indicate before vaccination that vaccination is not compulsory and that the person who has not been vaccinated should not be discriminated against. Discrimination is expressly forbidden if there are health risks or if someone does not want to be vaccinated. Vaccine manufacturers are encouraged to publish all information about the safety of the vaccines.
Discrimination in the workplace or a ban on travel for people who have not been vaccinated are legally excluded.
Every employer, travel agent, hotelier or home manager can refer to this resolution.
I can only agree with Mr. Walter Körner from Karlsfeld with regard to his letter to the editor, because a good friend has her sister two weeks after the second vaccination for pulmonary embolism (Biontec / Pfizer), as well as another acquaintance ten days after the second Astra-Zeneca died of cerebral vein thrombosis.
Mr Aiwanger is absolutely right, I hope he stays as smart and strong as he is!
Yvonne Kettemann
Rottach-Egern
A vaccination recommendation is a matter for specialists, not official doctors (child vaccination) and certainly not for politicians. But the vaccination inquisitors intensify their witch hunt and all those who do not want to share their madness are discredited at the stake in the public media landscape. In this way one quickly becomes a selfish refuser, even a danger to public health. Damage that is increasingly coming to light is ignored or played down. A reasonable discussion is obviously not possible. With good reason: Because authority is desired. Even the highest-ranking statesmen do not show themselves to smear their mustards. That alone is suspicious. And you can put your apocalyptic fearful future prognoses somewhere else. Speaking of Hubert Aiwanger:an ignoramus and splitter? Yes, even in the right corner he would fish, walk on a narrow ridge. Medieval? That’s what they say to him! But by no means! He's a solid rock, yes a modern Robin Hood in this disgusting, hypocritical social clinic. Last but not least: It would be absolutely necessary nowadays to add a New Testament to the Bible in order to honor the prophets Drosten, Wieler and Co. timelessly. The barrel is overflowing slowly.to honor the prophets Drosten, Wieler and Co. timelessly. The barrel is overflowing slowly.to honor the prophets Drosten, Wieler and Co. timelessly. The barrel is overflowing slowly.
Martin Pfab
Hohenpeissenberg
Hubert Aiwanger seems to me like a defiant, little boy who has been worried about the success and acceptance of a big boy (Söder) for a long time and who now believes that he has finally found a means to get those who also reject him on his side to be able to pull. If he were more farsighted, he would know that it would not work under any circumstances, because many like-minded people (opponents of vaccinations) will turn to him, but others (vaccination advocates) will turn away from him precisely because of this. I cannot agree with the letter writer Irmgard Wilke; Vaccination is not just about our bodies, but about the humanitarian duty to feel responsible not only for our own health, but also for that of our fellow human beings,thus about preventing a rapid rise in Covid-19 diseases and consequently avoiding new restrictions and lockdowns.
Above all, however, it is about getting our children back to normal school life as quickly as possible.
Should Ms. Wilke and those who share her views be prepared to quarantine until the danger of infecting others has been averted, there would be nothing wrong with this decision, just who should control it?
Otherwise, I consider a refusal to vaccinate for no good reason to be absolute selfishness, or an intellectual inability to see the extent of the problems that arise.
Annemarie Fischer
Wielenbach
Mr. Aiwanger is one of the last calm voices. He is exercising his rights as a citizen, he is unsure about possible side effects and warns against stigmatizing the unvaccinated. Now he is accused of only seeking votes, accused of dishonesty, admonished to duty and weighed down his concerns. This, however, not in a discourse, but precisely with words that he has warned about. In his high-handedness, Mr. Söder no longer notices that he is dividing society and defaming skeptics. In any case, there are very many people around me who struggle for their health, even for their life, after the vaccination. And if you ask doctors and others who are at the forefront, they report the same thing. The word spades is just not appropriate in therapy,which can also cause immense damage in individual cases. This does not speak against the vaccination per se, but calls for an honest discussion that also reflects reality. But you missed this discussion from the start. In any case, this is not how vaccination skeptics are motivated, but they are stigmatized and radicalized. Human freedom is the basis of our democracy. In any case, it is not Mr Aiwanger who is endangering them.
Olaf rib
Gilching
First, Mr. Söder introduces his deputy by asking the actually intimate vaccination question publicly only to put himself in a better light as the caring father of the country. But now Söder has gone over the top. However, Mr. Aiwanger has my respect because he is one of the few steadfast people who still dare to express their opinion publicly. The "allegedly bad side effects" should, however, be discussed publicly. We experience many cases of headaches and exhaustion that lasted for weeks after the corona vaccination, and we also heard of unexpected deaths. Restraint is also justified insofar as there are no long-term studies on the novel vaccinations. In the end, everyone has to bear the consequences themselves, whether that of a corona infection or that due to possible vaccination damage.Just to talk nicely about the vaccination, without serious scientific discourse, arouses my skepticism and I am neither right-wing nor lateral thinking! I wish Mr. Aiwanger a lot of strength to protect his and our personal rights.
Margret Madejsky
Gilching
Those who have been vaccinated, those who have recovered and those who have been tested are currently on an equal footing in everyday life, and the differences are barely visible. Vaccinated people do not have to be in quarantine. If the numbers rise again in autumn, the federal states will, as it were, take tougher measures again. A noticeable disadvantage for everyone who does not yet have vaccination protection. The debate about a general compulsory vaccination, particularly difficult for the state to order a general compulsory vaccination. Accordingly, it would make sense, if life and health could not be protected, if there were no other ways to prevent severe courses of the disease in many people, to think about such a step. Vaccination between duty and freedom: The question arises when more and more people do not allow themselves to be vaccinated, how far does citizens' freedom of choice extend, not just about their own,but about the health of their fellow citizens? In my opinion, every citizen should bear responsibility in solidarity, transparency and being the better argument in a climate of trust. With the Delta variant, we are in a race against time. The bottom line is that there is concern about the fourth corona wave, the number of infections continues to rise, and the discussion is gaining momentum. Politicians, with their different arguments, are talking about head and neck, it's annoying. As a short statement, there is a lot at stake: Vaccination is a must for everyone who thinks responsibly.the number of infections continues to rise, the discussion is gaining momentum. Politicians, with their different arguments, are talking about head and neck, it's annoying. As a short statement, there is a lot at stake: Vaccination is a must for everyone who thinks responsibly.the number of infections continues to rise, the discussion is gaining momentum. Politicians, with their different arguments, are talking about head and neck, it's annoying. As a short statement, there is a lot at stake: Vaccination is a must for everyone who thinks responsibly.
Herbert Clasen
Obergriesbach