I read, among a host of other articles with philosophical pretension directed against the sanitary past, that of a certain Blanchet-Gravel published in
Valeurs contemporaine
. He begins with these few lines that I quote because they are typical of anti-ax and anti-pass discourse with intellectual pretension (let us recall that 92% of those who support anti-pass are anti-ax):
“'A civilization which denies death by comes to deny life ”wrote the poet and essayist Octavio Paz. With the advent of the new health order, this is exactly what is unfolding before our eyes. We are entering a sanitized world, hypnotized by the zero risk ideal where the prevention of all conceivable perils seems to have become the ultimate project. ”
There follows the inevitable litany of arguments hostile to this health past which would deprive us of our fundamental freedoms, mark a break in our civilization, take a step towards dictatorship, etc., etc.
To discover
Michel Houellebecq: "A civilization which legalizes euthanasia loses all rights to respect"
Read also:
Anti-health pass rallies: should we expect an explosion of contamination among the demonstrators?
The verse being too well known for me to go there
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 78% left to discover.
Freedom is also to go to the end of a debate.
Continue reading your article for € 1 for 2 months
I ENJOY IT
Already subscribed?
Log in
