Jasmine Bullorini
08/05/2021 15:10
Clarín.com
Politics
Updated 08/05/2021 3:35 PM
After the complaint that the host Florencia Peña made against the PRO deputies, Fernando Iglesias and Waldo Wolff - for "breach of the duties of a public official" in "a context of psychological, media, institutional and symbolic gender violence" - her lawyer Fernando Burlando on Thursday sent the complaint to the president of the lower house, Sergio Massa, and asked the body for the "
immediate suspension" and process of lawlessness.
The letter entered the Deputies this afternoon to inform Massa of the criminal complaint filed before the Federal Court of the City of Buenos Aires against the two legislators.
In addition, it
requests that they be suspended immediately and that the petition for lawlessness be initiated
so that they are submitted to federal jurisdiction.
"Given the nature of the facts that are imputed to them and the flagrant illicit activity of those named that is public and notorious, we ask that honorable body to proceed with its
immediate suspension
, in accordance with the constitutional prescriptions and the circumstances considered in the documentation that is attached hereto, providing for the initiation of the corresponding
request for violation
in order for them to be submitted to federal jurisdiction, in accordance with the crimes that are manifestly accredited in the sub-examine, "says the letter accessed by
Clarín .
Hours ago, the head of the National Institute against Discrimination, Xenophobia and Racism (INADI),
Victoria Donda, confirmed that the body will accompany Peña in his complaint.
Once the list of visitors to the Olivos Presidential House was known to see President
Alberto Fernández
in full quarantine, the deputy and pre-candidate to renew his bench, Fernando Iglesias, referred to the cases of some women, implying that they were encounters " sexual ".
"He said that I had entered at nine in the morning and that this was a sexual scandal," Peña said at the time, adding: "I went to a meeting with protocol and I am not the President's cat. So, I understand the indignation that There may be ... you have a first lady that they have to comb ok, then each one will clarify but mix absolutely everything? ", he complained.
Iglesias came out to clarify his sayings but redoubled the bet: "I never said that Florencia Peña was the President's boss. I did say that she, Vargues and Pacchi are not work personnel and it was an abuse that they visited the President while they could not even fire dying. And that
the sexual scandals in Olivos are exclusively Peronist
"
And he added: "I also say that
Peña supported the insane quarantine imposed by the Government
, that it seemed reasonable to him that his mother did not have emergency surgery while visiting the President and that his concern for the actors should have been expressed by those who were persecuted for 12 years by the K ".
About Pacchi, the deputy wrote: "For me the lady was going to help him find the knob that turns on the economy to put Argentina on its feet", wrote Iglesias and his partner Waldo Wolff, replied: "But she on her knees, right?" .
After the scandal, Wolff clarified: "I made an irony on Twitter referring to a tweet from Iglesias that said 'they were going to turn on the economy knob regarding visits to Olivos and
I put' her on her knees 'and clarify' I mean the economy".
Other criticisms
The head of the ballot with which Iglesias will seek to keep his bench, María Eugenia Vidal, differentiated herself from Iglesias.
"I do not agree with that way of expressing myself. As a woman, I cannot accompany that way of expressing about other women. I think that if we really want to advance to a more equal society, we have to take care of those expressions."
said the former Buenos Aires governor.
Iglesias' benchmate, Silvia Lospennato, also questioned: "What Fernando Iglesias tweeted is lousy. We must ask for convincing explanations about the activity of non-essentials in Olivos, especially late at night, but of all men and women and do it without innuendo or prejudice. "