Brenze
news
A revealing column reveals a famous director's violence against his wife.
What did the court rule?
A woman posted a revealing column on a well-known website about the violence she allegedly experienced from her husband, a famous film director, who asked to have it removed.
The site system was dragged to court.
What is he ruling?
Tags
Newspaper
Claims
David Rosenthal
Tuesday, 17 August 2021, 12:16 Updated: 12:18
Share on Facebook
Share on WhatsApp
Share on general
Share on general
Share on Twitter
Share on Email
0 comments
According to the woman, through manipulative editing and well-known actors, her ex-husband released a film that severely defames her.
A famous film director, who directed a film and also included his ex-wife's filming, recently applied for a permanent restraining order against the publication of details about the parties' minor children and details of the proceedings conducted or conducted in their case in the family court. The director submitted the request because he learned that the woman had already contacted the media on the subject.
The Deputy President of the Family Court in Tel Aviv, Judge Mira Dahan, ruled that the request would be forwarded to the mother's answer, and she was required to respond to it within 5 days. A day after the judge's decision, a long column written by the mother was published on the Political-Reader website, in which she claims that her husband violently harmed her, threatened to murder her, and since she complained to the police and issued a restraining order, he has not filed lawsuits against her. To the family court, exhausting her and impoverishing her.
In addition, the mother claimed in Tora that her ex-husband made use of her photographs, which she forbade him to publish.
According to her, through manipulative editing and well-known actors, her ex-husband released a film that severely defames her.
Another claim in the Torah is that the State of Israel abandons it, because it continues to be captive to the violence of its husband, who this time operates it under the auspices of the law.
More on Walla!
After the investigations into Peretz and the corporation: The journalists' organization will deal with abuse at work
To the full article
The ugly conflict has reached the court, and as always, the children are in the line of fire (Photo: ShutterStock)
The train left the station
The mother's lawyer argued that the publication of the mother's column was not a disgrace to the court, because the mother did not refer to the proceedings in court, but to her relationship with her ex-husband, which she claimed was violent, and the mother's right to tell her story, especially in the METOO era.
In view of the publication of the column, the husband filed a petition for contempt of court, claiming that the mother published the column despite the court's decision regarding the permanent restraining order they filed, against disclosing the details of the parties' minor children, and against disclosing any details of the proceedings between the two As part of their request, the director's power of
attorney
demanded that the article be removed from a political-reading site immediately. The
mother's attorney, Adv. Arthur Shani, of the law firm Because the mother did not refer in it to the proceedings conducted in court, but to her relationship with her ex-husband which was allegedly contrived with violence, and the mother's right to tell her story, especially in the METOO era.
Also, Advocate Arthur Shani argued, the application for a restraining order on the publication of the article is empty of content, because the publication has already been made, and the discussion about uploading or downloading it from the network does not depend on his network. Peace, as the Family Court has no jurisdiction over nonprofits.
"I think the case should be closed and transferred to the Magistrate's Court, when it is clear that the famous director is abusing the family court for closed doors."
"The court can not remain indifferent"
The judge: "Even if the father proves everything alleged in the statement of claim, the relief sought is meaningless, given the fact that the publication has already been made."
Regarding revealing the identity of minors, Arthur attorney argued Monday that the law does not prohibit publication of information on parents, even when their minor children may suffer such advertising, such as in a criminal proceeding, as regularly published the identities of the suspects, even before convicted.
"Set The concept of identification is very problematic, "argued Advocate Arthur Shani," the plaintiff is a famous person, and many people know him, so they can identify the minors only by having something to do with it. There is no specific reference to minors in advertising, The supreme thing is that when discussing the case of a minor, the case of the specific minor and his best interests should be discussed. "
Judge Dahan ruled that "even if the father proves everything alleged in the statement of claim, the relief sought is meaningless, given the fact that the publication has already been made. The mother herself has no ability to influence the fact that the publication is already on the network, He must appeal in a separate proceeding. "
In doing so, Judge Dahan accepted Adv. Shani's claim that there is no place to discuss the issue of publishing the article in the Family Court.
What has been done cannot be answered.
Adv. Arthur Shani (Photo: Max Moron)
Remove the post
On the other hand, Judge Dahan noted, the court could not remain indifferent to the publication of details that could identify the parties' minor children, details that were revealed in the column written by the mother, in quite a few places, which the judge quoted.
"In his requests after the publication, the father sought to order the removal of the publication. On the other hand, the mother referred to her right and duty to publish the violence she experienced," Judge Dahan ruled in her ruling. "At this stage, the parties' arguments for and against the publication, since it has already been done in practice and its implications for the parties must be distinguished in other proceedings. However, the court can not remain indifferent, as stated, to possible harm to minors,
Accordingly, Judge Dahan ordered third parties - including a political website - to remove the publication as published,Or alternatively replace it and within 12 hours of publication from which any reference to minors will be removed.
"A perusal of the woman's column, which still appears on the website, shows that all the passages mentioned by Judge Dahan in her ruling have been removed from the network," says Adv. Shani.
Share on Facebook
Share on WhatsApp
Share on general
Share on general
Share on Twitter
Share on Email
0 comments
