The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Although the government is new, the policy in Gaza is old - Walla! news

2021-08-23T14:35:08.836Z


The Bennett-Lapid government has adopted the concept of separating the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in order to weaken the Palestinian Authority and strengthen Hamas. For 12 years we have tried everything but the only logical solution to the problem - the elimination of Hamas' terrorist rule by Mitoto. It will happen sooner or later, so why not sooner?


  • news

  • Opinions and interpretations

Although the government is new, the policy in Gaza is old

The Bennett-Lapid government has adopted the concept of separating the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in order to weaken the Palestinian Authority and strengthen Hamas.

For 12 years we have tried everything but the only logical solution to the problem - the elimination of Hamas' terrorist rule by Mitoto.

It will happen sooner or later, so why not sooner?

Tags

  • Hamas

  • Gaza

  • Gaza Strip

  • the Palestinian Authority

Haim Ramon

Monday, 23 August 2021, 16:04 Updated: 17:30

  • Share on Facebook

  • Share on WhatsApp

  • Share on general

  • Share on general

  • Share on Twitter

  • Share on Email

0 comments

Three months have passed since Operation Wall Guard.

The government then, the opposition today, and the opposition then which is the government today, have repeatedly repeated the mantra that "what was and everything related to Gaza is not what will be."

Reality proves that everything that was in the past is happening even today.

Peak where things went back to normal is demonstrations Hamas on the fence, there was mortally wounded Sgt Barel Shmueli, all of course with no significant response.



Fuel and construction materials cross daily crossings, some of them going to the military wing of the terrorist organization, and again they build tunnels through Although the money will no longer go through suitcases but through a card for every consumer, and will enter through a mechanism by which the UN will transfer it to a bank in Gaza, parts of it will eventually go to Hamas.

The GSS estimates over the years that a third of the money that comes in the form of goods or cash ends up in the hands of Hamas.

More on Walla!

After the shooting of a border fighter: The IDF builds a security strip in Gaza

To the full article

Things returned to normal in record time.

Demonstration on the fence, this week (Photo: Reuters)

Then the question is repeatedly asked: What is the solution?

And it should be mentioned again and again - the problem throughout the Netanyahu government and also in the Bennett-Lapid government is that there is a political decision.

The political decision is that Israel wants to preserve the separation between the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, in order to weaken the Palestinian Authority and strengthen Hamas.

This has been the case since 2009.

And to those who doubt the unwritten alliance theory between Hamas and Netanyahu, I quote Netanyahu: "The transfer of money is part of a strategy to separate the Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank, and anyone who opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state should support the transfer of funds from Qatar to Hamas." .

This is Netanyahu's quote about his policy.



If that is not enough, Maj. Gen. Gershon HaCohen, a clear right-wing man close to the prime minister, said the following: Hamas is an enemy, in the covert dimension it is an ally. "

The Bennett government forgot everything they said they were in opposition to and adopted the concept of separation, which is clearly priced - the abandonment of the residents of the south in general and the Gaza Strip in particular to the terrorist organization Hamas.

For more than 12 years we have tried everything.

There were promotions, there were the brides, there was a massive inflow of funds.

The illusion that Gaza can be rebuilt not through Hamas, but that the residents will rise up and revolt against this cruel organization that has devalued them, these are dreams in aspemia.

Those who think Gaza residents will rise up against Hamas live in illusion (Photo: Reuters)

After each military operation, there were statements by all prime ministers and defense ministers that Hamas had received a decisive blow. These statements turned out to be baseless. What to do? To change the concept, which unfortunately the rabbi also continued in the "government of change". The concept should be a strategic decision, which should lead to the collapse of Hamas. The claim that the collapse of Hamas could lead to worse rule, as if it could be worse than Hamas and Palestinian jihad, is ridiculous.



It is unequivocally clear that Hamas will be replaced by the PA, which is the legal government in Gaza and not any other factor. The desire to overthrow the Hamas regime is shared by Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states, which worked to bring the PA back to Gaza. Regional cooperation with moderate Arab states can be used against Hamas and Iran's affiliate.



It should be understood that we cannot have an Iranian base in the Negev near the question of debt, it is impossible.

It is not possible for the State of Israel to bow to a city of terrorists.

We tried everything, except for the only logical solution to the problem - the elimination of the regime of terrorism and the Iranian arm in the south of the country.

Everyone who talks about the disarmament of Hamas is actually talking about the collapse of Hamas.

After all, in the end there will be no choice and we will have to collapse Hamas sooner or later, so why not sooner?



The writer served as an MK and minister in the Israeli government

  • Share on Facebook

  • Share on WhatsApp

  • Share on general

  • Share on general

  • Share on Twitter

  • Share on Email

0 comments

Source: walla

All news articles on 2021-08-23

You may like

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-03-28T06:04:53.137Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.