The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Anti-feminism in South Korea: the length of a woman's hair and the size of a man's penis

2021-08-26T11:16:23.948Z


There was criticism of the hair of an Olympic athlete and notices that irritated for 'humiliating' the men. Does that happen in society?


Florence Guzman

08/26/2021 6:30 AM

  • Clarín.com

  • Culture

Updated 08/26/2021 6:30 AM

When South Korean An San, the current

Olympic gold medalist in Bow

, received misogynistic attacks for wearing short hair, headlines about the wave of anti-feminism in South Korea traveled the world.

What was not shown is that the person who wronged

An San

at his own school was immediately identified and is now facing the appropriate legal consequences.

While the rest of South Korea

celebrated its triumph:

 as can be seen in their social networks, her compatriots flooded her with love and did not allow a tiny group of haters to tarnish her moment.

But

anti-feminist activism

in

South Korea is

not just a couple of trolls;

nor to the traditional values ​​linked to

Confucianism

of which modern South Korea is the main cultural heir (and which could explain other aspects of the situation experienced by women and dissidents in South Korean society).

The particular anti-feminism that is emerging in

South Korea

is more similar to the so-called "movements for men's rights", the red pill and the manosphere - the virtual spaces exclusively for men, which oppose feminism and claim masculinity.

In the West they have intellectual references such as the psychologist Jordan Peterson.

An San.

The athlete criticized.

Photo EFE

They are movements that have a strong presence on YouTube;

During the pandemic, they also reached the mass media.

More than anything, they appear as

a right-wing reaction to neoliberal feminisms,

mainly in the United States.

In South Korea it emerges as a conflict of gender and class, but most especially over the accumulated tensions

between the younger generation and its predecessors

.


In South Korea something similar happened to the "revolution of the daughters" in Argentina.

It is

the peers of that generation

- who are now between 25 and 30 years old - who question on the right their place in South Korean society today.

A bit of context

Under the Moon Jae-in government, South Korea reached

the highest unemployment levels in the past two decades

.

Relatively low looking at the numbers from Argentina and in the context of a pandemic.

But this is not what young South Korean men perceive when compared to their female peers, or even worse when they consider men over forty.

In addition, young women get better grades in two crucial exams for South Korean society: the dreaded

Suneung,

which is the University School Aptitude Test;

and the PSAT, which is an entrance exam to the career of public servant.

Not only do these exams have centuries-old historical roots, even for some authors (Evans, 1996) these exams are one of the main causes of the success of the developmental type of state and

a highly competent state bureaucracy

that produced the South Korean economic miracle.

The reality is that

80 percent of South Koreans have a university degree

, something that has become

a minimum requirement

within the job market, while entry into the public service is highly desired due to the stability and prestige it confers.

It is women who

perform better on both exams

in an extremely competitive society.

To this is added that men must do compulsory military service, since, technically, South Korea is still at war with North Korea, and the economic remuneration for putting your life on pause for two years is equivalent to only a quarter of the salary basic.

These are

the main arguments

of men's rights activists against affirmative action policies in South Korea.

An immovable roof

On the other hand, the "glass ceiling" that prevents women from climbing has remained largely unchanged: how far they can go falls off the cliff after the age of 40 when compared to men of the same generation.

For this reason, they previously postponed the family project, but today more and more women decide directly that forming a family is not theirs:

the birth rate

fell to 0.8 and is

the lowest in the world

.

The heavy workload at home and hostility in the work environment they experience when they return to work after maternity leave also contributes to this decision.

South Korea: Ads that sparked controversy over finger gestures

In South Korea,

one of the largest social divisions is generational:

respect and obedience to the elderly in the workplace and within the family.

The generation of men born in the 2000s believes that women over 40

made many sacrifices

and suffered discrimination, but they do not believe the same in the case of young women in their 20s.

That is why they argue that it

is hypocritical

for the generation of President Moon Jae-in, a self-proclaimed feminist, to dictate gender policies when they are directly responsible for the discrimination suffered by women in South Korean society.

Other.

A gesture that spread and angered.

Affirmative actions to reverse this situation, they argue, are aimed

at a generation that supposedly did not experience it

.

This feeling of anger against the political establishment resulted in the emergence of the political figure

Lee Jun-seok,

current president of the conservative People Power Party 국민 의 힘.

Of humble origins and a Harvard scholarship graduate, Lee is called "the South Korean Trump" for his charismatic participation in television debates, in which he positioned himself as

the anti-feminist voice

and where he capitalized

on the anti-establishment sentiment of South Korean youth

.

He thus became the historically youngest leader of the main opposition party of conservative values. Although we could not precisely say that the current ruling party is the feminist utopia, it is true that they promoted policies to reverse a situation that left South Korea in the lowest position in terms of gender equality within developed countries according to the OECD .

For its part, the

delirious debate

that triggers the popularity of

Lee Jun-seok

dealt with, among other points,

an advertising poster

for the G25 chain in South Korea last May.

The controversial sign read something like

Let's go camping!

It was illustrated by a hand holding

a mini sausage

between the index finger and the thumb, the same gesture that in Argentina would be equivalent to asking for a cut.

A similar gesture

can also be seen in the iconography of Megalia, a radical feminist group that has been denounced for

misandria

(hatred of men)

.

This similarity was the reason to justify the boycott of three advertising campaigns so far this year.

Hate speech or over-interpretation?

The point is that in the debate the feminist representative Jiye Shin only focused on the fact that there was no evidence of the connection between feminist groups and the company of the advertisement, trying to present the facts in the most objective way possible.

For his part, Lee Jun-seok said something like that the sausage there was not relevant to promote camping products, but that it was commonly used to refer to the male genitalia and that, therefore,

the intention was to humiliate

by referring to at its length ... who could be confident after repeatedly seeing that image?

Gesturing and repeating that it was all "very suspicious",

Lee Jun-seok

fueled the conspiratorial idea.

Beyond the strong presence of radical feminism on Twitter and anti-feminist comments on forums such as Ilbe Storage House,

a war of the sexes is not perceived in the streets of Seoul

.

What you do feel is

irreversible progress in terms of expanding rights

and progress in conversations about sexual dissidence, made visible through culture, cinema, novels and music.

A relevant case is the Seoul International Women's Film Festival that is taking place these days in the South Korean capital: here most of the progressive activism is concentrated.

But progressive or conservative, South Koreans conceive that

an advanced country is not just an economically developed country

.

And there is nothing that unites South Koreans more than the desire to belong to an advanced country, regardless of what "advanced" actually means.

* Florencia Guzman is a Researcher in Social Theory and Korean Society at Kookmin University, Seoul.


Look also

Korea today: Argentine footprints in the country that only wants to be the future

"Kim Ji-young, born 1982", Korean feminism

Source: clarin

All news articles on 2021-08-26

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.