Chestnut trees - as journalists call essential seasonal topics - provoke poor debate.
The proof is with the rather lamentable controversy over the purchase of flat screens - do we still sell CRT televisions, for that matter?
- with the back-to-school allowance.
This controversy is still heartbreaking.
It is particularly unwelcome this year.
With the implementation of "whatever the cost", we accepted the windfall effects, and therefore that some companies receive aid which they did not actually need, considering that the efficiency of the system was at this price.
And we could not tolerate that modest households do not strictly use a service as it was designed?
See also
The State aims for more than 1 billion savings thanks to the reform of housing allowances
We railed for months against a health policy whose infantilization we denounced, and we would demand to control the destination of each euro of allowance paid?
No matter whether the back-to-school departments are
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 79% left to discover.
Freedom is also to go to the end of a debate.
Continue reading your article for € 1 the first month
I ENJOY IT
Already subscribed?
Log in
/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/prisa/KMEYMJKESBAZBE4MRBAM4TGHIQ.jpg)
