The ranged weapons pass continues between Sandrine Rousseau and Gérald Darmanin.
Faced with the threat of the latter to publish private exchanges concerning them, the environmental candidate was indignant that the Minister of the Interior could "
flout the law
".
The feminist reserves the right to “
take legal action
” on what is “
no small matter
”.
To discover
Presidential 2022: where are the candidates in the polls?
Read also Remote account settlement between Sandrine Rousseau and Gérald Darmanin
Tensions began with the first debate by environmentalists.
Sunday, Sandrine Rousseau described the appointment of Gerald Darmanin to the government of "
humiliation
" made to women.
This Wednesday, the minister engaged by declaring that the feminist "
did not have the same vision of (s) a person
" when she was running for the direction of the Regional Institute of Administration (IRA) of Lille.
Before threatening her to "
publish meeting requests and appointment requests
."
"Bullying Above the Law"
“
I had been selected at the end of three interviews prior to hiring (...) and it was Gérald Darmanin who blocked my appointment. So yes, I asked him for an appointment by SMS,
”clarified the candidate first. Above all, Sandrine Rousseau accused the minister of "
breaking the law on the set
", since "
the threat of publicly broadcasting private conversations is punishable by law
".
“
What I take away from this episode is that he is a minister who is capable of putting intimidation above the law, because that is what he is doing.
It is intimidating me by flouting the law,
”again lambasted the candidate, inviting the minister to publish the famous exchanges.
According to her, the words of the "
first cop in France
" are "
very serious
".
All the more so because he holds them against a "
candidate for the presidency of the Republic
".
To read alsoSandrine Rousseau, the candidate "woke" subscribed to the controversies
Once again, Sandrine Rousseau insisted on “
humiliation for all the women who had denounced violence within the framework of Me Too
”. "
It is not a legal question
", she swept away while Gerald Darmanin is placed under the simple status of witness assisted in the case in question. “
It's an ethical question. How can we have at the head of a Ministry of the Interior, at the head of the police, a person accused of a crime?
"
