The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

France condemned by the ECHR for a judgment notified too late

2021-09-09T11:18:46.377Z


France was condemned Thursday, September 9 by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) for having taken fifteen months to send to a man on ...


France was condemned Thursday, September 9 by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) for having taken fifteen months to send a man the full judgment of his sentence, an "

anomaly

" according to the ECHR.

Read alsoTwo former French detainees at Guantanamo seize the ECHR

The applicant, born in 1926, was sentenced in July 2012 by the correctional court of Albertville (Savoie) to three years in prison in a case of concealment of precious objects, according to a press release from the Court.

He immediately appealed, without however having the full judgment and the reasons for his conviction, which his lawyer had only obtained in October 2013, fifteen months later.

Counsel relied in particular on a previous judgment of the ECHR rendered in 2007 against France in a similar case, arguing "

that such a failure to communicate constituted a violation of Article 6 of the

European

Convention

" on Human Rights ( right to a fair trial), recalls the Court.

While the defendant had obtained a partial discharge at first instance, the judgment of March 2014 of the Court of Appeal of Chambéry found him guilty, however, because of his age, replacing the prison sentence with a fine of 100,000. euros. "

The original of the duly motivated judgment should have been filed with the court registry within three days of its delivery

", notes the Court, which refers to an "

anomaly

". The applicant had "the

only way out of appealing without knowing any element of the motivation adopted by the court

", which exposed him "

to the possible aggravation of his sentence

" on appeal without being able to "

measure his chances of success

" , points out the Court.

Read alsoThe ECHR rejects the request of 672 firefighters against the vaccination obligation

Concluding that there has been a violation of Article 6, it recalls that the reasons for a judgment or a judgment "

penalizing a person

" must be "

communicated in good time

" in order to be able to challenge these decisions "

in full knowledge of the facts

" .

France will have to pay 5,000 euros to the applicant for costs and expenses.

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2021-09-09

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.