The fourth Durban Conference will convene on September 22, and is a reflection of the first Durban Conference.
The one that 20 years ago purported to discuss human rights violations and the fight against racism, but in the takeover of Muslim countries hostile to Israel, carried out a diplomatic lynching.
So like today, Israeli diplomacy remains surprised, beaten and unresponsive.
Among the decisions that were then put to the vote: Israel is an apartheid state, and therefore boycotts should be imposed on it and the countries that support it should be condemned;
Israel commits genocide and crimes against humanity, and therefore an armed struggle must be waged against it;
And the Zionist movement is essentially a racist movement.
The conference was a festival dripping with antisemitic venom.
The guest of honor was Yasser Arafat.
The BDS movement and all the isolation activities and boycott initiatives familiar to us were born from Durban.
From here, European countries began to condemn and condemn Israel for any action it took to protect itself from the deadly waves of terrorism.
Hence the establishment of the UN Human Rights Council, whose 50 percent of decisions are against Israel, and the Goldstone report is the fruit of its womb.
From here, the International Court of Justice in The Hague got the upper hand to prosecute Israel for war crimes.
Durban was also the UN's catalyst for engaging in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict obsessively and biasedly. Using its veto power, 12 resolutions against Israel in the Security Council.
In the current composition of the Biden administration, it will be very challenging to extract an American veto on anti-Israel decisions.
And today? The Palestinian Authority, under the auspices of the Hague and the various UN councils, has been vigorously working to take full advantage of the forthcoming conference for another savage attack. The erroneous assumption that in any war against radical human rights organizations we order another murky wave of hatred against Israel - must be shattered. "In the United Kingdom and Canada, which prevent entry into the country from those who threaten to sue them. We must collect a price from those UN envoys responsible for the false reports regarding IDF operations.
But how do we lament the countries of the world, while the state authorities themselves become active partners in the boycott of Israel and turn their backs on the fight against anti-Semitism? The ombudsman is currently preventing the possibility for Jewish business owners in Judea and Samaria to sue the UN Human Rights Council for spreading the blacklist, even though it is a discriminatory and racist list. The Jerusalem court has applied for its sixth ruling since August 2020 , But the ombudsman refuses to rule for fear of upsetting the UN, claiming that his representatives are negotiating to soften the decisions. So before we point the finger of blame at the countries of the world, it would be better for the country's top officials to stop behaving like exiled Jews who do not believe in our right to the state.
Adv. Nitzana Darshan-Leitner heads the Shorat Din organization
