She just needed to indulge.
Nadine Fabre, Cédric Jubillar's mother, shared on Thursday September 16 her concerns about the possible involvement of her son in the disappearance of Delphine Jubillar, her 33-year-old daughter-in-law, not found since December 16, 2020. That day , she contacts the program "100% clairvoyance" of the radio channel "100% radio" and asks to be put in touch with a psychic.
Read alsoDisappearance of Delphine Jubillar: the third request for release of the husband refused
The show is not live, which reassures Nadine Fabre, who asks if it is possible not to be recorded. "
My client clearly asked before recording not to be recorded and broadcast,
" confirms with
Me Jessica Chefaroudi, Nadine Fabre's lawyer. But the exchange between the clairvoyant and Nadine Fabre is recorded, and, during the discussion, the respondent's mother speaks to the clairvoyant, saying she is "
" that her son, currently indicted for "murder on spouse ”, is“
I would like to know where is the body of my daughter-in-law so that we can offer her a decent burial.
», She confides on the radio.
A few days later, despite his express request not to broadcast, extracts were published in an article by the web editorial staff of "100% radio".
"Invasion of privacy"
After a few days of reflection, the media decides to carry out a "
" of this information, specifies "100% radio", which publishes this Wednesday September 22 an article containing the remarks made by Nadine Fabre during her meeting with the clairvoyant .
Of course, we are committed not to broadcast the soundtrack, on the other hand, we are not committed not to publish extracts with an analysis
", explains to
Bruno Vidal, one of the two authors of the article.
The reason for this publication? “
These words have an important journalistic interest: Nadine Fabre has said twice that she was convinced that her son was guilty. If this case must one day be heard by an Assize Court, it is an element that can count
", continues the journalist, who assures to have, before the publication of the article, contacted the lawyer of Nadine Fabre,"
to have a counterpoint
”. The penalist concluded an agreement with the radio: in exchange for the non-broadcasting of this recording, Nadine Fabre undertook to grant an exclusive interview to "100% radio". “
This document is, for a regional radio station like us, a golden document. By choosing not to broadcast this audio, we made a strong decision
", Considers" 100% radio ".
To read also "Jubillar, Grégory or Maëlys they are, at the beginning, worrying disappearances": on the trail of the missing (almost) never found
During this second interview with, this time, a journalist, Nadine Fabre retracts and claims to have "
" since her interview with the clairvoyant: "
I leave it to the courts to do their job
", confides- she does.
Has she really changed her mind or has she been briefed by her lawyer?"
Personally, I just see a lady torn between her love for her son and her difficulty believing in his innocence
”, comments Bruno Vidal who, the day after this interview, published an article with extracts from the program“ 100% clairvoyance ”.
, Nadine Fabre's lawyer denounces an “
It is a recording which is fraudulent and which is an invasion of privacy
", affirms Me Chefaroudi, who "
is currently considering taking legal action against this media for invasion of privacy
We used a person's suffering to click. Whether or not she is convinced of her son's guilt is irrelevant to the investigation. She's just a lady whose son is in prison and lost her daughter-in-law. She was extremely disturbed lately by the intervention in the press of the father of Cédric Jubillar. She just looked for answers to her questions
“, She insists, indicating that a reaction from her will come“
in the days that follow
Cédric Jubillar's lawyer, Me Jean-Baptiste Alary, also pointed out to Le
that it was a "
violation of private discussions
" that took place while Nadine Fabre was "
in a weak position.
During the second interview granted to the local radio station, the main interested party considered that her interview with the clairvoyant was only a "
bottle in the sea