Mobile communications and no end in Icking.
After the local council only agreed in April on a location for a new 35-meter mast, which should make the antennas along the B 11 superfluous, Julian Chucholowski (SPD) surprisingly spoke out against this construction site at the meeting on Monday .
Icking - With this he recognized open doors on different sides of the committee.
In the end, the council postponed the item to its meeting next week.
He rejected all points of the resolution that the “Protection against Electrosmog” working group had drawn up on the subject after the citizens' meeting.
Looking for a location for nine years
All possible attitudes to the whole were presented at the meeting. There was the parliamentary group that urged to act now - after "doctoring around" at a possible location for nine years, as Philipp Geiger (Greens) said. Claudia Roederstein (UBI) feared that a new version of the old discussion could annoy the operators so much that they are no longer willing to cooperate with the community - and simply lease the next piece of land for their projects. The community's lawyer, administrative lawyer Frank Sommer, had already warned in the town hall that the community, if they mess around for too long, could end up like the couple in the fairy tale of the fisherman and his wife - and nothing would be achieved.
But it also showed that many in the committee are not happy with the mast, as it was decided in April.
It would be on the southwestern edge of the property near the clubhouse and could not be overlooked.
Gerhard Haisch, architect of the clubhouse, had spoken out against the location in advance in a direct mail.
The mast would spoil the area, so Haisch.
Decision a "disaster"
At the meeting, Chucholowski said that the discussion in the community was going "in the very wrong direction". What was decided in April was a "disaster". He does not believe that a location on the edge of the forest, which was initially discussed and which Vodafone first agreed to, only to then discard it in the summer of 2020 for "structural reasons", could not be realized. Money shouldn't play a role in this case. "Only because of the additional costs are we ready to block our beautiful sports facilities," says Chucholowski. In the forest, even a 40 meter high tower would be much less noticeable.
He received encouragement from various quarters.
Geiger admitted that the community may have given up too quickly in the negotiations.
“Maybe we should have turned a loop,” said the Green Council.
Vigdis Nipperdey (Ickinger Initiative) went one better.
You have "no desire to the matter", by which she meant the location decided in April, "to agree", she said.
“We lost bit by bit in the whole process, that annoys me.” She does not understand that the slope edge, ie the location at the edge of the forest, should not be possible for structural reasons.
"There are high-voltage pylons everywhere."
Resolution rejected
Only in one single point has a single municipal council, namely Julian Chucholowski (SPD), approved the resolution drawn up by the “Protection against Electrosmog” working group. The point was that the radio operators should address the issue of "local roaming", that is, to share available networks with one another. “That makes sense,” said Chucholowski, but was left with his own opinion. Some people clapped in the auditorium, including Michael Welle, spokesman for the working group. Everything else that he and his fellow campaigners had suggested was rejected: the municipal council does not want to establish “white zones” in the municipal area in which radiation exposure should have been minimized, nor to negotiate with the operators about regular monitoring of immissions.It was not considered sensible to include new transmission technologies such as LiFi in the discussion. Philipp Geiger (Greens): “LiFi is an extremely new development that we still know far too little about.” Working to ensure that “indoor loads” remain as low as possible and that the mobile communications debate focuses on “outdoor solutions” “Limited - the council did not want to follow that either.
Mayor Verena Reithmann (UBI) was not very happy about “going back to zero now”.
She made it clear that the church had never made it easy for itself.
The location southwest of the clubhouse simply turned out to be the lowest common denominator.
The Icking tennis club would also have been very happy with the solution.
Deliberations postponed
A request from Chucholowski to have the legal consequences checked first, should the community back down again, was not voted on because Stefan Schneider (UBI) had suggested postponing the deliberations to next Monday.
Until then, the administrative lawyer Frank Sommer should be asked again for his opinion.
ak
By the way: Everything from the region is now also available in our new, regular Wolfratshausen-Geretsried newsletter.
