Ministry of Foreign Affairs Facts List︱ over a hundred examples of US intervention in Hong Kong spanning 30 months

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs today (24th) released the "Factual List of US Interference in Hong Kong Affairs and Support for Anti-China and Disrupted Hong Kong Forces" with more than 8,000 words. It lists as many as 102 items. The US's words and deeds on the Hong Kong issue since February 2019 Measures include passing the "Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act" and imposing sanctions on Hong Kong officials.

The list accuses the United States of slandering and slandering the affairs of the SAR, shielding and supporting anti-China chaos in Hong Kong, and interfering in Hong Kong affairs by collaborating with allies.

The Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office of the State Council expressed its firm support, saying that the "Fact List" is a powerful counterattack against the United States' repeated slander and smear of the Chinese government's governance of Hong Kong and flagrant sanctions against Chinese officials.

The spokesperson said that the "list" is conclusive evidence, showing how hard the United States has intervened and supported the anti-China chaos in Hong Kong, describing it as naked and reckless.

The Commissioner’s Office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Hong Kong described the list as the "criminal record" of the United States. Facts have repeatedly shown that the United States is the biggest man behind the destruction of Hong Kong's prosperity and stability.

The spokesman said that the list is also a powerful counterattack against bullying by the US recently issued a "Hong Kong Commercial Warning" and sanctions against officials of central agencies in Hong Kong. It is also a powerful warning to all external forces and anti-China chaos in Hong Kong.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs today released the "Factual List of the United States Interfering in Hong Kong Affairs and Supporting the Anti-China Troubles in Hong Kong," which is over 8,000 words long. It lists as many as 102 items.

(Reuters)

The first category is about a series of bills and motions

The list of relevant facts is divided into five categories. The first category concerns the passage and deliberation of a series of bills and bills by the Washington and U.S. Congresses, including the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, the Hong Kong Autonomy Act, the Hong Kong Safe Harbor Act, and even A bill that recognizes "Hong Kong Independence".

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs classified it as the United States "concocting a Hong Kong-related bill, discrediting China's Hong Kong policy, interfering in Hong Kong's internal affairs, and wantonly interfering in China's internal affairs." There are 4 items in total.

+8

The list is classified according to the time sequence. The second category diagram prevents the national security law.

All categories detail the state of affairs and the development of different words and actions in the United States in chronological order.

The second category "Bullly imposing sanctions in an attempt to obstruct the smooth implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law and the relevant decisions of the National People's Congress of China in Hong Kong." There are 14 items listed. Related commercial preferential measures, subsequent bans on the export of defense equipment, termination of the transfer of fugitives, and sanctions on Chinese and Hong Kong officials for nearly 14 months are all intended to prevent the implementation of the National Security Law.

The list shows that on February 25, 2019, the then U.S. Consul General in Hong Kong, Tang Weikang, publicly expressed concern about the Hong Kong government’s proposed amendment to the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance, claiming that the amendment may affect the implementation of the bilateral agreement between the United States and Hong Kong.

(Profile picture)

The third type of slander SAR affairs, 48 ​​items started before the anti-amendment law

There are 48 items in the third category, including the measures taken by the United States before the anti-regulation campaign. It is also the earliest occurrence in the list. The first item occurred on February 25, 2019. Concerns about the Regulations, claiming that the amendment may affect the implementation of the bilateral agreement between the United States and Hong Kong.

Later, the US State Department and Congress successively pointed out that the amendment would threaten Hong Kong's autonomy.

This category is summed up as "slandering and slandering the affairs of the SAR, arbitrarily arguing about Hong Kong police's enforcement actions, and undermining the prosperity and stability of Hong Kong."

Examples include criticizing the police for handling demonstrations with violence, beautifying the anti-revision demonstrations, holding hearings on the situation in Hong Kong, and a series of critical remarks and actions in response to different events in Hong Kong. For example, the Apple Daily ceased publication in June this year, and US President Biden In a statement on the White House website, "using freedom of the press as an excuse to falsely claim that "a sad day for media freedom" signifies that "Beijing is stepping up its suppression of pressure."

+5

The fourth category involves supporting Hong Kong disruptors and naming a group of democrats

The fourth category is "Shielding and supporting anti-China chaos in Hong Kong, providing a platform for them to peddle "Hong Kong independence" claims and spread political lies". There are 25 items in total, which can also be traced back to the anti-amendment legislation. The first item was named in March 2019. Anson Chen, Martin Lee, Huang Zhifeng and the "US-China Working Group" of the House of Representatives visited Hong Kong to discuss amendments to the legislative amendments and disqualification of candidates for the Legislative Council.

Later, Chen Fang Ansheng, Guo Rongkeng and Mo Naiguang visited the United States and requested US sanctions.

Many examples in this category involve interactions between the democrats and the United States. Others named Li Zhuoren, Mai Yanting, Wu Aiyi, Tu Jinshen, Luo Guancong, Zhang Kunyang, Liang Huangwei, Li Zhiying, Liang Yingmin, etc. were named.

The list described the U.S. side as "no distinction between right and wrong, and reversing black and white as illegal elements."

The fourth category of the list accuses the United States of "protecting and supporting anti-China chaos in Hong Kong", dating back to March 2019, naming Ansheng Chen, Martin Lee, and Huang Zhifeng with the US-China Working Group of the House of Representatives to discuss amendments and cancellations Qualifications of candidates for the Legislative Council, etc.

(Profile picture)

+4

The fifth category of U.S. alliance with allies to interfere in Hong Kong affairs

There are 11 items in the last category, criticizing the United States for gathering allies to jointly interfere in Hong Kong affairs. Examples include requesting the UN Security Council to discuss the situation in Hong Kong, and successively working with the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, the League of Seven, the Five Eyes Alliance, and the European Union. The joint statement and other methods "make irresponsible remarks on Hong Kong affairs."

From June to July this year, the United States and 43 countries jointly signed an anti-China speech initiated by Canada, expressing concern about Hong Kong’s "human rights violations". Afterwards, the "Media Freedom Alliance" of 21 countries including Europe and the United States also included the "Apple Daily". Suspension of publication and the arrest of the pro-democracy faction issued a joint statement.

Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office: It is clear that the United States holds double standards in democracy and human rights

The Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office stated that the "list" is conclusive evidence, which makes it clear that the United States is pursuing a hypocritical "double standard" on issues of democracy, freedom, human rights, and the rule of law, as well as the hegemonic nature of obsessing with being a teacher and trying to mess up. Hong Kong's sinister intention to contain China's development.

The spokesperson said that the wishful thinking of the United States will not work after all. The implementation of the National Security Law and the improvement of the electoral system have transformed Hong Kong from chaos to governance and from governance to prosperity.

No external intervention can shake the firm determination of the Chinese government to fully and accurately implement the "one country, two systems" policy.

The Commissioner's Office in Hong Kong: Announced to the world that China's sovereignty and security cannot be challenged

The Office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Hong Kong pointed out that the list shows China's firm determination, strong will, and strong ability to defend national sovereignty, security, and development interests and maintain Hong Kong's prosperity and stability. It is a "crime book" and a "warning bell."

The checklist system sorts out all the bad deeds in the United States since the turmoil in the revision of the regulations, describing it as making these despicable methods and sinister intentions clear to the world.

The spokesperson pointed out that the release of the list informs the world that China’s sovereignty, security, and development interests cannot be challenged, and any attempt to use the “Hong Kong card” to curb China’s development will not succeed. He called on the US to “see itself from the illusion of blocking Hong Kong’s chaos anyway. Come and wake up from the myth of the zero-sum game."

01News

The British warned persons involved in national security and law not to have extradition agreements with Hong Kong. National Security Agency: Official Lam Cheng and Chuan must be investigated to the end︱ sighs that "dark violence" hurts the feelings of mainlanders. The introduction of the National Security Law can strengthen relations in the future. The rivalry between the two models of the United States and the United Kingdom prohibits the Chinese ambassador to the United Kingdom from entering Parliament in response to the sanctions imposed by Beijing. The Anti-Foreign Sanctions Act is imperative, but the anti-sanctions law must be implemented carefully. reason