The leaders and officials of the Member States of the United Nations continue to deliver their countries’ speeches from the podium of the United Nations General Assembly in a scene that has become familiar and uninteresting for many reasons, foremost of which is the lack of commitment by the major powers to the Charter of the United Nations and their role in maintaining international peace and security and the exploitation of the Assembly’s platform to justify its national policies and projects Which is based on the interests of other countries.
The advantages of this mobilization for developing or poor countries are confined to two directions: the first is the presentation of their problems, their positions, their national vision and the future of the world, and the second is in the bilateral dialogues and meetings held by their representatives on the sidelines of this global meeting with their other counterparts, and what this may result in correcting policies or strengthening bilateral cooperation.
It is well known that the United States and its Western allies refuse to consider the feasibility of this meeting and the increasing international calls to get rid of its showy character and to be feasible and to issue decisions that contribute to ending the eras of Western hegemony and resolving international issues and disputes that accumulate with each passing year.
Likewise, Washington, under the pretext of preserving the structures of the international organization, refuses to cancel this meeting because of its political and economic gains and opportunities to keep pace with countries’ positions on their global policies, conduct a comprehensive assessment of them, and prepare plans and projects to deal with them, positively or negatively, without the need for direct talks or through other parties.
The speech of US President John Biden at the opening of the Assembly meeting shows the states' rejection of any participation by the emerging countries in managing international files and finding solutions to conflicts and crises that Washington sees as a threat to American national security, and what was stated in his speech about his country's insistence on fighting and firmness alongside its partners In the Pacific and Indian Oceans, in a clear reference to China, it opens the door to the outbreak of more conflicts in that region and beyond, leading to the ignition of a third world war that Washington will not hesitate to provoke, even if it leads to the annihilation of humanity.
Over the past decade, Washington has worked to exaggerate the issue of its competition for world leadership, and its officials do not leave an international event without warning of the dangers of some countries going on this path, especially China, which is what Biden wanted to say in his speech about the escalating threats to the interests of his country and its allies in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. .
The absence of coordination between the majority of developing and poor countries regarding what is happening on the international scene, as well as the decline in the role of traditional regional blocs in this regard, helps the United States and Western countries in imposing their domineering will and policies on the world, which calls for a review of these organizations and blocs and activating their role before their systems collapse. In front of the power and strength of the new blocs.
The role of the Non-Aligned Organization and the Islamic countries has significantly declined at the regional and international levels, and the living proof of this is the absence of its position regarding Washington’s attempts to escalate the conflict in the Pacific and Indian Oceans, which will have serious repercussions on international peace and security and on the largest trade movement in that vital region of the scientist.
The majority of the world's countries can force the United States and its allies to change their positions on international issues if they agree among themselves to boycott meetings of the General Assembly and other international organizations once, and the governments of these countries bear responsibility for their failure to confront the hegemony of the major powers in the areas available to them.