Aggression in Lyon: "If we consider the white man as an executioner, the violence against him becomes legitimate"

Former local elected, Céline Pina is an essayist and activist.

She is the founder of "Viv (r) e la République", she has also published

Guilty Silence

(Kero, 2016) and

Ces Matériaux Essentiels

(Bouquins, 2021).

To discover

• Michel Houellebecq: "A civilization which legalizes euthanasia loses all rights to respect"

FIGAROVOX.

- A complaint was filed Monday, October 4 for "violence committed in a meeting" and "public insult on the grounds of race".

A couple was allegedly attacked on Friday in Lyon, against a background of anti-white racism.

Does this prove that racism has no color?

Celine PINA.

-

Racism is a way of reducing people to a skin color and assigning fixed characters to it.

This color defines who you are.

Racism is a way of reducing the individual to the group, of making him endorse a story that he has not constructed and thus reduce it to a sum of prejudices and clichés.

It has long been thought that in order to be the target of racism, you have to belong to a minority.

What anti-white racism shows us is that in order to be a victim of racism, it suffices to be the subject of a hateful narrative that reduces the individual to an appearance that cannot be chosen.

The accusation of racism is the business of a left which has nothing more to say to the world and which, failing to fight for equality, has found an outlet in the fight against discrimination.

Celine Pina

The "

whiteness

"

narrative

is deployed by racialists, these so-called anti-racists influenced by the

woke

movement

and by the Islamists. This anti-whiteness racism has been built on our soil around a false story that makes "

White

" and the West the source of all evil. Colonization and slavery, however also practiced by Arab Muslims, Whites, Blacks and Jews are seen as the only flaw of the Whites. At the same time, they are denied the fact that they are whites who theorized the rejection of slavery and thought of human dignity as the basis of the equality of all men.

Their goal is to create resentment in certain sections of the population who are invited to identify with victims of persecution while whites are pointed out as responsible for all the difficulties.

And it works.

Read also Abnousse Shalmani: "

The new anti-racism is a racism disguised as humanism

"

However, part of the left affirms the opposite ...

The accusation of racism is the business of a left which has nothing more to say to the world and which, failing to fight for equality, has found an outlet in the fight against discrimination. As such, it can deny anti-white racism insofar as the fact of cultivating this form of hatred in certain black or Arab-Muslim communities has real consequences in terms of decomplexing attacks but does not translate into control checks. policies, exclusions from nightclubs, difficulties in accessing employment or housing. In other words, because racial discrimination is absent and only translates into social exclusion when one belongs to the majority, the reality of hatred of white, such as the fact that it is theorized by political movements ,is denied.

As soon as we allow politico-religious movements to sow hatred and make a skin color a mark of infamy, we allow violence.

If the white man is an executioner and all the others are his victims, then the exercise of violence is justified, it is even seen as a form of justice.

Celine Pina

It is all the more denied that part of the left, the so-called Islamo-leftist, is a co-producer of the discourse on “

systemic racism

” and disseminates a false story on the issue of slavery in particular. It started with Christiane Taubira, limiting her law on the memory of slavery to the denunciation of transatlantic slavery (that of the Whites) and forgetting the Arab-Muslim slave trade, however more important and murderous (castration was there systematic). The justification for this choice given by the politician, idol of the left, was that the "

young Arabs

" "

do not carry on their backs all the weight of the legacy of the misdeeds of the Arabs.

".

On the other hand, assigning Western children to an infamous inheritance does not bother her.

It is all the more ridiculous that slavers were rare in a society where at the time 80% of the French lived in the countryside and whose society was not based on slavery.

This instrumentalisation of anti-racism, not to advance equality, but to put France and the French on trial, is the work of that part of the left which has abandoned social struggles in favor of staging racial hatred.

Read also Rachel Khan: "The conviction of Taha Bouhafs reminds us that racism has no skin color"

What other lessons should we draw from this miscellaneous incident?

Is this a sign of rampant insecurity?

As soon as we allow politico-religious movements to sow hatred and make a skin color a mark of infamy, we allow violence.

If the white man is an executioner and all the others are his victims, then the exercise of violence is justified, it is even seen as a form of justice.

This way of cultivating the hatred of the so-called Caucasian population by creating a mythical story where the population of foreign origin is necessarily victim and the population of the host country, necessarily guilty, can only give rise to violence, insecurity and clashes.

But this particular racist dimension which also feeds insecurity is passed over in silence or even denied.

Yet it produces real effects that this type of aggression bears witness to.

Because anti-White racism was deployed under the banner and in the name of anti-racism, identity entrepreneurs were allowed to speak without daring to fight it.

Celine Pina

Are we doomed to be helpless in the face of this phenomenon?

No.

You just have to stop letting activists explain that France has set up systemic racism, which historically corresponds to a form of apartheid.

The accusation is ridiculous, but it works with the target audience.

However, instead of fighting their delusional accusations and letting them disseminate their ideology at the university, the politicians and the media wanted to give pledges to these people who judge men according to their skin color. Because anti-White racism was deployed under the banner and in the name of anti-racism, identity entrepreneurs were allowed to speak without daring to fight it. Worse, it has been taken up at the highest level of the state, the qualifier "

white men

" becoming almost an insult, an offense against "

diversity

". We remember Jean-Louis Borloo, reduced to the denomination of "

white man

" when he came to deliver a report on city policy. "

White man

»Became a humiliating and disqualifying term.

To read also "The" wokism "thrives thanks to the faults of a mortified West"

To fight against racism whatever it is, is to fight against all identity entrepreneurs, from the far right as from the far left, racialist as well as Islamist. These people all have the same enemy: the idea that men can be equal because they share the same human dignity. They are clans and classify individuals according to external criteria: skin color, sex, religion. From the differences they create closed identities, from these identities, they create hierarchies and their fight is to hoist their clan to the top of the food pyramid, not to create common values, to seek universal values ​​or an interest. general likely to unite men in a common project. They only see fraternity and union as a function ofa level of melanin, which is equivalent to reducing the links between men to their physical resemblance and to depriving them of any possibility of union of minds in the name of the difference of bodies. A terrible regression.

This is what politicians should denounce instead, for some, of seeing in this type of accusatory and racist speech a way of securing an ethnic clientele.

It is to an uplifting effort that our policies should encourage so that our links are made on the sharing of principles and ideals and not on physical criteria.

Unfortunately, they too often prefer to be the sounding boards of a guilt that does not need to be.

Fighting against discrimination of any kind is a just cause, but not when this fight becomes the pretext to justify racism.

And hatred of the "

White

" is one of the forms.