The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

"Why so much aggression against the decision of the Polish Constitutional Court?"

2021-10-11T19:15:03.198Z


TRIBUNE - The Polish constitutional judge has just decided that certain articles of the Treaty on European Union are incompatible with the country's Constitution. His reasoning is classic and respectable and, in France, the highest courts are a close position.


Jean-Eric Schoettl is former Secretary General of the Constitutional Council, and Honorary State Counselor.

On October 7, 2021, the Polish Constitutional Court ruled that Articles 1 (which proclaims an

“ever closer union of the peoples of Europe”

) and 19 (relating to the Court of Justice of the European Union) of the Treaty on the European Union contravene the Polish Constitution in so far as they allow it to be set aside in favor of European law.

Is therefore condemned not the treaty itself, but the principle of the primacy of European law over national constitutional rules.

This principle of absolute primacy finds its origin in a Costa v Enel judgment of July 15, 1964 of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (now Court of Justice of the European Union):

“The law of the Treaty could not, because of its original nature, being judicially opposed to any internal text. "

What the Warsaw Constitutional Court wanted to mark is that the Polish Constitution does not provide for the surrender of sovereignty in the areas in question.

Jean-Eric Schoettl

If it had declared incompatible with the Constitution

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 90% left to discover.

Freedom is also to go to the end of a debate.

Continue reading your article for € 1 the first month

I ENJOY IT

Already subscribed?

Log in

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2021-10-11

You may like

News/Politics 2024-02-29T12:24:26.392Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.