The existing tensions between Tehran and Baku can only be viewed through the concept of the invisible hand that ignites the fire between the two parties, especially if we look a little towards asking a traditional and realistic question, which is the beneficiary..?
The question leads to one answer, which is the powerless Zionist entity towards Tehran, had it not been for Ankara. The head of the current Turkish regime sees that its interests must be through access to Central Asia and the view of the strategic Caspian Sea through the Azeri gate without Iranian disturbances, so it will be a broker between Azerbaijan and “Israel” as a means of facilitating communication To destabilize Iran from within as an Israeli goal and to displace Tehran from the balance of regional powers in that region as a Turkish goal, but from the Azeri arena.
Tehran expressed, through diplomatic channels, its concern over Israeli activities in the South Caucasus and stressed that it will not tolerate any geopolitical changes, especially after Baku closed the Armenia-Europe road to Tehran after the second Nagaroni-Karabakh war, not to mention that the war of words between Tehran and Baku was accompanied by maneuvers and military movements within Frightening groups and alliances open to all possibilities..
Therefore, it is necessary to pause for a long time in front of the head of the Turkish regime, Erdogan, the broker of the region, with a ceiling of satisfactory ambitions beyond the ordinary, in implementation of his authoritarian expansion project, which did not stop at the borders of Syria, Iraq and Libya to knock on the African gate through Kenya without concealing his aspiration to expand further in North Africa while maintaining the strategic goal of joining. the European Union in pursuit of its dream.
Erdogan, who is threatening today to launch a new aggressive military operation in Syria, brags about the existence of differences with Russia and America over resolving the issue of the Kurdish threat, according to his claims, to proceed to impose a new reality on the ground in which he reinforces his conditions at the negotiating table with the Russians and the Americans.
Today, the developments on the ground and the complexity of files and hot squares have produced two sides of the coin of state terrorism: the entity of the Israeli enemy and the Erdogan Brotherhood regime.
Damascus, which is restoring its role and presence in the region and confirms its keenness to restore its entire geography and expel the occupying forces from its land, was and will remain a thorn in the throat of the Turkish regime, which sensed the value and importance of Damascus’ role and its strategy to connect the five seas to focus on drawing a map of its ambitions and strategy in a way that hinders the Syrian role.
The current brokerage is a diabolical act that only those who have practiced it from a young age can do. This is the essence of Erdogan, which imposes a different mechanism in view of his plans and dreams.
