The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Kirchdorf's Greens want an urban framework plan: "So that the villages keep their soul"

2021-10-15T08:10:29.304Z


Is there a need for an urban planning framework agreement in order to preserve the rural structures? Yes, say Kirchdorf's Greens - and do not convince their political comrades-in-arms.


Is there a need for an urban planning framework agreement in order to preserve the rural structures?

Yes, say Kirchdorf's Greens - and do not convince their political comrades-in-arms.

Kirchdorf

- The Greens want to prevent Kirchdorf from losing its charm through future structural measures and are therefore calling for an urban planning framework. However, the mayor and the majority of the municipal councils do not see any need for action - and refused. The topic was off the table within a few minutes, there were no explanatory contributions from the rejecting party - except for City Hall boss Uwe Gerlsbeck (CSU). 


Local councilor Martin Heyne (Greens) the surprise was clearly written on his face, he had expected an extensive discussion - but it did not materialize. Because basically the Greens refer to the closed meeting of the councils a few months ago, when this topic was also discussed. Heyne's justification for the necessity of an urban development master plan, which he presented in the application as follows: "In order for Kirchdorf and the surrounding districts to retain their charm, the officers of the Office for Rural Development, who accompanied the municipal council meeting, urgently advised us to to focus on the creation of a master plan for sustainable development. ”The problem: There is no current urban planning consideration - moreover, according to Heyne, the zoning plan is out of date.With such a new planning, structures, peculiarities and characteristics could be recorded according to the green and conclusions could be drawn so that the villages could keep their soul and at the same time a careful development could take place.

“Yes,” said Gerlsbeck, “we were on a retreat and we also talked about it.” In the case of major structural developments, however, it would be discussed in the council anyway. In principle, however, development plans would be sufficient to be able to direct a development - as would also be explained in detail in the statement on the application. However, according to the document, the statement refers to inclusion statutes. Heyne warned: “This is about two different discussions.” Only in the last third of the statement does it then say: The administration does not see it as necessary to expand the urban planning framework. Reason: Building applications that do not concern the development plans of the Kirchdorf community are rare.In addition, construction projects must fit into the nature of the environment - according to the administration, this ensures that the local character is retained. In addition, the costs of such planning would be disproportionate and possibly not small. “We also don't know what the next year's income will look like,” stressed Gerlsbeck.

(By the way: Everything from the region is now also available in our regular Freising newsletter.)

Heyne couldn't understand that, because after all, the district administrator probably also recommended such an urban planning framework.

It would be extremely important for the Greens to take a thorough look at the structural and rural development.

He also gave a few examples of this: The “baker's house” and a central place for the community, a town center, so to speak.

What the Greens would also like: First of all, research what it would cost in the first place.

“It probably won't be billions,” as Heyne said.

According to his knowledge, all strategic papers are too old for a good strategy of how things should go on with Kirchdorf and the districts. Silvia Milburn (Greens) also found clear words: "It's all too visionless for me, we now have to set the course and not just react!" after numerous possibilities had been pointed out, none of them would be used now.

What could no longer be clarified, however, was something completely different: The rejection letter from the administration mentions a neighboring municipality that strengthens the inclusion statutes via a fundamental resolution - for example through the municipality's purchase rights to land.

"Which village do you mean?" Asked Milburn.

Neither the mayor nor the managing director Florian Haider could answer that, however, because the building authority wrote the statement.

With only four votes in favor of such a future plan, the Greens' motion was rejected by a majority.

Richard Lorenz

Source: merkur

All news articles on 2021-10-15

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-24T16:44:36.875Z
News/Politics 2024-02-15T00:19:21.678Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.