Zolling actually wanted to issue an enclosure statute in which fences and the like are laid down.
In the end, however, there was only one mood.
Zolling
- It is, as Mayor Helmut Priller himself says, his "hobby horse": an enclosure statute for the municipality of Zolling.
On Tuesday the adoption of such a statute was on the agenda of the municipal council.
But nothing has been decided yet, Priller's “Hobby Horse” is a bit paralyzing.
Wherever there is no development plan regulating the height and type of fences and property enclosures, the current Bavarian building regulations permit an enclosure of up to two meters in height to be built.
(By the way: Everything from the region is now also available in our regular Freising newsletter.)
Priller had photos of such systems with him and expressed his concern that entire streets would look like “gorges” - a lane between wooden walls, gabion fences and concrete walls. “If that is the future of Zolling,. . . “, Priller left the sentence expressing his fears unfinished. And that is why the administration had taken the statutes of the municipality of Attenkirchen as a model, in which - and this was important to Priller to emphasize - only the appearance of the roadside fencing should be regulated.
How a homeowner separates himself from his neighbors or on the back of his area is not part of the statutes - nor is the fencing in commercial areas. But there was resistance in the council: Stefan Wöhrl (CSU), for example, appealed for nothing to be regulated. It would be much more important to revise the parking space statutes and to insist on compliance, because cars parked outside the property are much more disruptive and would impair the appearance of the place much more. Karl Toth (UBZ) and Manfred Sellmaier (CSU) agreed with him.
Toth suggested discussing the subject at the upcoming closed meeting.
After all, a few weeks don't matter now either.
And because you want to look at other statutes, the agenda item was postponed.
After all, when asked what height should be specified for the fencing in question - the variants ranged from 1.2 to 1.5 meters - Priller succeeded in asking for a picture of the mood in the committee: Twelve councilors voted for a height of 1.3 meters.