"How to protect children from ideologues of gender theory?"

Ruben Rabinovitch is a psychoanalyst and co-author of

To discover

• Michel Houellebecq: "A civilization which legalizes euthanasia loses all rights to respect"

"

" said Captain Ahab from his whaler in

. An information report "On gender stereotypes" was submitted on October 6 to the National Assembly. Let us briefly summarize the main points so as not to eat in the still too short time that we have left to live: little boys play too much at fire trucks and little girls too much at dolls. The information report is adorned with the finery of expertise since it incorporates the now essential triptych varnish of academic scientificity: a survey, statistics and an emeritus professor of sociology at Science-Po. Let the impatient not get impatient because the solutions to the insoluble human question have all been found: "

","

","

",

.

Let us start again from a platitude which is unfortunately no longer a commonplace: the woman is sculpted on the body of the man and the man is hollowed out in the body of the woman.

Man and woman, father and mother, brother and sister, day and night, moon and sun, OM and PSG are terms that only exist in relation to each other.

The difference between the sexes is only supported by their oppositions and their complementarities.

In other words, the polarity of the sexes has nothing "binary" as the

would

ideal and the civilizational endorsement of the difference between the sexes is far more decisive than the cultural, historical and changing issues of sexual orientations and the virtues attributed to one or the other sex. At the court of Henry III, men adorned themselves with jewels, attributed feminine finery to themselves without renouncing their masculinity and, by this very provocative ostentation, made it triumphantly shine.

Let's even push the envelope a little further and recall Isaac Louria among us thanks to Charles Mopsik, his greatest French ferryman. In Isaac Louria, rabbi and kabbalist born in Jerusalem in the sixteenth century and recognized as the deepest thinker of Jewish mysticism, Adam, after being considered the bride of God in the Garden of Eden becomes, once cast out, a " divorced woman ”. The community of Saphed, of which he was the Rabbi, however, did not consider him either a heretic or a rebel when he wrote that "

", that he is "

", that there exists as such"

», That a woman by the body can be a man by the soul and vice versa, just as masculine and feminine characters can coexist and even collaborate within the same person.

There is nothing androgynous about the entanglement within the same individual of the masculine and the feminine because this polarity is not neutralized, but coexists.

Here are the murderous fallouts of

and

: to suggest that, because there is ambiguity in sexual identifications, this would imply that people, small or large, would not be in their "real" body. and that it would be opportune for them to be able to change it.

Ruben Rabinovitch

In the analyst's office also, if goes through a fantasy realm far more extensive than the maid's room

the LGBTQIA +. We can hear a man homosexually loving a woman (a man who loves the feminine part of a woman from his own feminine position), a woman heterosexually loving another woman (a woman who loves the feminine part of a woman since her own masculine position), a man lesbianly loving another man (a man who loves the feminine part of a man from his own feminine position).

We still remember that nine-year-old girl, sitting in the patient chair, still too small for her feet to touch the floor, declaring sad and worried because she loved to play at tying her father's ties around his neck. and wanting to be strong like a boy: “

»Here they are the murderous fallout of

and

: to suggest that, because there is ambiguity in sexual identifications (and how could there not be some in infancy and then, again, in adolescence?), this would imply that people, small or large, would not be in their "real" body and that it would be advisable for them to be able to change it.

Confusing what is developed at the level of fantasy with the reality of the body is not to help individuals to constitute an authentic subjective position, a position which is theirs, but to inject them with delirium.

Adults do not help children by leaving them to themselves, but by giving them limits, starting with their own body.

The limit is a gift and to give limits is to give protection and freedom.

The

and

stadiums ultimate capitalist, do not keep the promise of collective emancipation, but threaten us with a attroupée alienation, do not participate in the advent of an authentic subjectivity, but plotting the contrary view of its liquidation.

Ruben Rabinovitch

The

and

, ultimate stage of capitalism, do not keep the promise of collective emancipation, but threaten us with a attroupée alienation, do not participate in the advent of an authentic subjectivity, but plotting the contrary view of its liquidation. Because we are mistaken to speak of our Western societies as more and more "individualistic" societies. While walking in the street, we meet fewer individuals than identical monads, selfish, rival and hateful. The individual has been reduced to the rank of a crowd particle. The

and the

seek only to get rid of their singularity. Everything, on the contrary, is a pretext to set out in search of new clan identifications where they can finally dissolve their own individuality. Let us note in passing that this current passion for taking charge by the clan, for the sacrifice of its subjectivity to obscure tyrants, if it is still reduced today to cultural and religious systems could expand tomorrow, we can only to fear it, to political systems.

For the instinctive sneer in the face of any limitation, the ecstatic prostration before youth, the unleashed hatred against any figure of authority, the contemptuous refusal of representation in pictorial art, the relegation of the beautiful and the promotion of principle of the ever more recent, in contempt of the elites for themselves, to the subversion of language and its writing, to the denial of the real of the body, to the permanent transgression of forms and traditions, to relentless enjoyment, the decline of all truth in opinion, the revolt against the eternal polarity of the sexes unfortunately usually follows, as history has taught us, an enraged appeal to an intractable Master who will blow a whistle of blood at the end Of the game. Let us worry about getting to whatOrtega y Gasset predicted in his

from 1929 and that the future will not take charge of denying: "

"