Is the single-family house really "ecological, economic and social nonsense"?

THE QUESTION

.

The pavilion with garden is "

".

This statement by the Minister of Housing, pronounced last Thursday in front of an audience of professionals in the sector, had the effect of a "

".

Since then Emmanuelle Wargon has returned to her remarks, ensuring that there was no question of ending the single-family house.

The controversy has done a lot of damage and now raises the question of the future of the single-family home.

To read alsoHLM and "individual houses": the Minister of Housing in the role of the watered sprinkler

According to her, the minister wants to promote a new model that is more sober in her opinion, and which creates social links: terraced houses, closer to town centers and which provide close proximity to shops, transport and other public spaces that are lacking around housing estates.

Therefore, does the individual house have its place in the "

" provided for in the Climate and Resilience Law, published in the Official Journal on August 24?

In other words, is the single-family home really "

"?

CHECKS

.

Just three years ago, the government, through the voice of its former spokesperson Benjamin Griveaux, mocked "France which runs on diesel".

A declaration which had set fire to the powder and engendered the revolt of the "yellow vests".

Three years later, this time it was the French with a single-family home who were entitled to a frontal charge.

And there are many: more than one owner (58% of French people) in two has one, according to INSEE.

Ironically, in government, almost as many ministers and other secretaries (around 70%) have one in their patrimony.

This is the reality that the Minister of Housing tackled.

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 74% left to discover.

To cultivate one's freedom is to cultivate one's curiosity.

Continue reading your article for € 1 the first month

I ENJOY IT

Already subscribed?

Log in