The CSU Irschenberg has objectively resolved the resignations of its two municipal councils.
Nevertheless, one flaw remains: reasons and plans should have already been on the table in the municipal council.
The CSU Irschenberg has objectively resolved the resignations of its two municipal councils.
Nothing indicates a grudge, those who have left praise the local association.
In a conversation with our newspaper, they also openly and honestly explain their reasons and plans. The Irschenbergers now know what happened and how things will continue: The local council can work without resentment.
That's how it should be.
CSU withdrawals in Irschenberg: Objectively resolved - but too quietly
Nevertheless, one flaw remains: the background and outlook should have been mentioned in the municipal council.
Two or three sentences from those who had left would have been enough: Why?
What's next?
Complete.
Voters deserve local councils to explain on their own initiative why they are leaving the party they were elected with.
Mayor Meixner should have said more than just referring to internal discussions.
And he should have given names clearly.
The fact that the municipal councils even risked giving their protest away for the sake of harmony - those who want to set an example by leaving the party must shout their reasons into the world - is due to the character of the body.
Noiseless work obviously has a system there.
Giving controversial reasons does not suit the mood.
More from Irschenberg:
Niklasreuth: Photo friends Parsberg show photo works of art from all over the world
But it should.
If municipal councils only discuss possibilities and express criticism behind closed doors, voters cannot possibly check whether they have considered all points of view and whether there is no cheating.
These debates are as important as the decision itself.
They rarely happen in Irschenberg.
The administration already enters unanimous voting results on the table so that they can later be copied one-to-one into the minutes.
This goes too far.
If the local council discussed more publicly, the harmony would survive.
And voters would be better informed.