Opinion | "Human Rights" in the Service of Terrorism Israel today

The United States recently asked Israel for clarification regarding the Ministry of Defense's declaration of six bodies impersonating civil society - as terrorist organizations. It seems that this time it is not a crisis, but it is important that it does not develop in the future.

Palestinian organizations that support a violent struggle and conduct delegitimization campaigns against Israel, receive political support and are generously funded by European governments and organizations, under the guise of promoting human rights. Even those of their comrades who do not drop bombs or shoot at violent extremist units are the "fighters" of terrorism: raise funds to finance the attacks, pay terrorists and their relatives, recruit new members to the organization and feed the violent atmosphere in Palestinian society.

In the end, these are canaries with canary skin, who have learned to recite slogans foreign to their values ​​and worldview and to the deceptions of Americans, Europeans and even a handful of Israelis, who insist on lying to themselves. Like pedophiles who speak in the name of love, they act in the name of human rights, mobilizing important value for nefarious purposes. It is easy for them to do so, as perverted radicals and confused purists have managed to take over with hostility a very large part of human rights organizations, and the discourse in this field in the international arena. To the victims of terrorism.

The money that finances these organizations comes mainly from Europe, but the danger of immunity to terrorism from Israel's countermeasures can only be realized through the administration in Washington. Israel needs American assistance on a variety of issues, and must prove to the administration that its steps do not suppress legitimate social and humanitarian activity. In the face of "progressive" and radical anti-Israel elements in the media and in academia, it is a shame to corrupt an effort, but in the face of the administration, and in the mainstream of American society, it is important and convincing. Some even deserve to be exposed to intelligence. The Biden administration is critical and suspicious, but not obsessed with Israel and less naive towards the Palestinians than Obama, who caused severe damage throughout the region: refrained from helping the "green revolution" in Iran in 2009, played a key role in ousting Mubarak and bringing the Muslim Brotherhood to power in Egypt. Sisi, who saved the Middle East from the Turkish-Egyptian "Muslim Brotherhood" axis, who was an officer in the region.

The harmful recipe, also known from the time of President Carter, focuses on pressure on US-backed regimes, in a way that actually serves anti-American radicals. Extensive political hold on the Arab public.

But in Arab societies, the choice is between pro-American authoritarian regimes that strive for regional stability and even worse radical repressive regimes that threaten to drag the Middle East into conflict and destruction. The brave and impressive liberal-pluralistic minority, which wants democracy and the promotion of human rights, is a negligible factor in the Arab political arena. The radicals, in the form of Nasser, Assad, Saddam Hussein or Khamenei, cannot be moderated, domesticated and mobilized; Do not even bribe. They can be confronted only by local American-backed authoritarian rulers - relatively "soft", like King Hussein, or more rigid like the Shah in Iran, al-Sisi in Egypt and Regent Ben Salman in Saudi Arabia. The real choice is between the hard-to-digest and the catastrophic.

The terrorism of Hezbollah and the Palestinians - led by figures like Arafat, Nasrallah and Sinwar - can only be thwarted by an Israeli approach that combines determination, deterrence, suspicion and rigidity in the face of enemies, along with restraints of an open society and a democratic state.

Facing an American failure in the war on terror in Iraq and Afghanistan, which ended in escape, is an Israeli success to live and prosper for generations alongside oppressed terrorism, with no option to flee.

Drying up the resources of the Popular Front is required for this.