The court ruled that it was unconstitutional to build a small house in the form of a "private agreement" or "land exchange" in the judicial review case of Ding Power the year before last.
The judicial review applicant Guo Zhuojian applied for an appeal earlier. The Court of Final Appeal handed down the verdict today (4th), unanimously dismissing the appeal, and ruling that the small house policy is protected by the Basic Law, that is, the original residents use private agreements, land exchanges, or use their own land Building small houses is constitutional.
The Development Bureau welcomes the ruling and will continue to receive and process relevant applications, and will fully consider different factors in the process of processing applications.
+7
The Development Bureau said that it welcomes the decision of the Court of Final Appeal. The government will continue to accept and process small house applications as usual in accordance with the small house policy, and will continue to fully consider different factors in the process of processing the applications, including the applicant’s original resident qualifications and the planning of the application site. Purpose, supporting facilities, etc.
Small houses can be built in the form of private agreements, land exchanges, or free housing licenses.
(Profile picture)
Ding Power Review｜The final court ruling policy is a traditional right protected by the Basic Law. Guo Zhuojian ultimately loses the Ding Power’s final appeal｜Guo Zhuo insists that the court has no money and plans to withdraw the final court for the public interest and quasi-free deposits
01News